141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12808666)
1. Liability in prenatal ultrasound screening.
Mavroforou A; Mavrophoros D; Koumantakis E; Michalodimitrakis E
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):525-8. PubMed ID: 12808666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Wrongful birth litigation and prenatal screening.
Pioro M; Mykitiuk R; Nisker J
CMAJ; 2008 Nov; 179(10):1027-30. PubMed ID: 18981444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. New trends in obstetrical ultrasound malpractice litigation in Israel.
Ticho A; Kreisberg GA
Med Law; 2004; 23(4):725-33. PubMed ID: 15685911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wrongful birth and informed consent: Reed v. Campagnolo.
Kennedy I
Med Law Rev; 1994; 2(2):234-7. PubMed ID: 12159831
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Malpractice risk assessment among different approaches for informed consent.
Sato RL; Yamamoto LG; Li GG
Hawaii Med J; 2000 Sep; 59(9):357-61. PubMed ID: 11055115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Doctors, confidentiality and the law.
Korgaonkar G; Tribe D
Br J Hosp Med; 1992 Jul 1-28; 48(2):124-6. PubMed ID: 1504696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Wrongful birth, wrongful life: the doctor between a rock and a hard place.
Lenke RR; Nemes JM
Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 66(5):719-22. PubMed ID: 2414704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical issues in obstetric ultrasonography.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Dec; 35(4):758-62. PubMed ID: 1451359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Must physicians reveal their wounds?
Furrow BR
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1996; 5(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 8718726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Legal norms relevant to the practice of human genetics: a background paper.
Robertson G; Miller J; Howell T; Penney S
Health Law J; 1995; 3():187-211. PubMed ID: 10569875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Litigation: a pact of silence.
McLean MT
Midwifery Today Childbirth Educ; 1992-1993 Winter; (24):11. PubMed ID: 1339543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Informed consent: I.
Miller LJ
JAMA; 1980 Nov; 244(18):2100-3. PubMed ID: 7431542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. New prenatal screening procedures raise spectre of more "wrongful-birth" claims.
Capen K
CMAJ; 1995 Mar; 152(5):734-7. PubMed ID: 7882235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Doctors' dirty little secrets: the dark side of medical privacy.
Furrow BR
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2001 Feb; (262):9-42. PubMed ID: 11280844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The new rules on informed consent.
Rice B
Med Econ; 2000 Jun; 77(12):150-2, 156-7, 161-2. PubMed ID: 11010472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Vindicating the patient's rights: a comparative perspective.
Giesen D
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():273-309. PubMed ID: 10126941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Legal aspects of prenatal diagnosis.
Rhodes AM
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jun; 31(2):233-52. PubMed ID: 3402112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Genetic counseling and the law.
Reilly P
Houst Law Rev; 1975 Mar; 12(3):640-59. PubMed ID: 11664464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Consent to medical treatment.
Heneghan C
Lancet; 1991 Feb; 337(8738):421. PubMed ID: 1671437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Perinatal transmission of HIV: cause for the resurrection of wrongful life.
Hernandez JF
John Marshall Law Rev; 1994; 27(2):393-410. PubMed ID: 11654700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
