These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Intraoperator and interoperator repeatability of manual and semi-automated measurement of increased fetal nuchal translucency according to the operator's experience. Kagan KO; Abele H; Yazdi B; Böer B; Pintoffl K; Wright D; Hoopmann M Prenat Diagn; 2011 Dec; 31(13):1229-33. PubMed ID: 22024964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intra- and interoperator reliability of manual and semi-automated measurement of fetal nuchal translucency by sonographers with different levels of experience. Abele H; Hoopmann M; Wright D; Hoffmann-Poell B; Huettelmaier M; Pintoffl K; Wallwiener D; Kagan KO Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Oct; 36(4):417-22. PubMed ID: 20734371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional ultrasound for nuchal translucency thickness measurements: comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound. Worda C; Radner G; Lee A; Eppel W J Soc Gynecol Investig; 2003 Sep; 10(6):361-5. PubMed ID: 12969779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How true is a 'true' midsagittal section? Wah YM; Chan LW; Leung TY; Fung TY; Lau TK Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 32(7):855-9. PubMed ID: 18973236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intra- and interoperator reliability of manual and semi-automated measurements of intracranial translucency. Karl K; Kagan KO; Chaoui R Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Feb; 39(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 22081521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Image magnification does not contribute to the repeatability of caliper placement in measuring nuchal translucency thickness. Herman A; Maymon R; Dreazen E; Caspi E; Bukovsky I; Weinraub Z Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Apr; 11(4):266-70. PubMed ID: 9618850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The application of three-dimensional ultrasound to nuchal translucency measurement in early pregnancy (10-14 weeks): a preliminary study. Chung BL; Kim HJ; Lee KH Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Feb; 15(2):122-5. PubMed ID: 10775994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of image size on nuchal translucency measurement. Edwards A; Mulvey S; Wallace EM Prenat Diagn; 2003 Apr; 23(4):284-6. PubMed ID: 12673630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Semiautomated ultrasonographic measurement of fetal nuchal translucency using a computer software tool. Bernardino F; Cardoso R; Montenegro N; Bernardes J; de Sá JM Ultrasound Med Biol; 1998 Jan; 24(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 9483771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three- versus two-dimensional ultrasound for nuchal translucency thickness measurements: comparison of feasibility and levels of agreement. Eppel W; Worda C; Frigo P; Lee A Prenat Diagn; 2001 Jul; 21(7):596-601. PubMed ID: 11494299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between two- and three-dimensional ultrasound measurements of nuchal translucency. Clementschitsch G; Hasenöhrl G; Schaffer H; Steiner H Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Nov; 18(5):475-80. PubMed ID: 11844167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of fetal neck position on nuchal translucency measurement. Whitlow BJ; Chatzipapas IK; Economides DL Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Aug; 105(8):872-6. PubMed ID: 9746380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]