These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12808693)

  • 21. The forcible treatment of criminal defendants.
    Appel JM
    Med Health R I; 2003 Nov; 86(11):367-9. PubMed ID: 14692338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Seeking an answer: questioning the validity of forcible medication to ensure mental competency of those condemned to die.
    Stricker BW
    McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 32(1):317-40. PubMed ID: 15709265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mental health advance directives: having one's say?
    Dunlap JA
    KY Law J; 2000; 89(2):327-86. PubMed ID: 12737165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Riggins v. Nevada: towards a unified standard for a prisoner's right to refuse medication?
    Dlugacz HA
    Law Psychol Rev; 1993; 17():41-83. PubMed ID: 11659926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Involuntary medication of patients who are incompetent to stand trial: a review of empirical studies.
    Ladds B; Convit A
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(4):519-32. PubMed ID: 7718925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Involuntary medication treatment for competency restoration of 22 defendants with delusional disorder.
    Herbel BL; Stelmach H
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 17389345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Sell effect: involuntary medication treatment is a "clear and convincing" success.
    Cochrane RE; Herbel BL; Reardon ML; Lloyd KP
    Law Hum Behav; 2013 Apr; 37(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 22746284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Involuntary medication of patients who are incompetent to stand trial: a descriptive study of the New York experience with judicial review.
    Ladds B; Convit A; Zito J; Vitrai J
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(4):529-45. PubMed ID: 7914440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Riggins v. Nevada.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1992 May; 112():1810-26. PubMed ID: 12041282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sell v. U.S.: involuntary medication to restore trial competency--a workable standard?
    Gerbasi JB; Scott CL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 15497635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. AAPL Practice Guideline for the forensic psychiatric evaluation of competence to stand trial.
    Mossman D; Noffsinger SG; Ash P; Frierson RL; Gerbasi J; Hackett M; Lewis CF; Pinals DA; Scott CL; Sieg KG; Wall BW; Zonana HV;
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(4 Suppl):S3-72. PubMed ID: 18083992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pre-adjudicative and adjudicative competence in juveniles and young adults.
    Redlich AD; Silverman M; Steiner H
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(3):393-410. PubMed ID: 12808697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Right of a defendant to refuse antipsychotic medication during a criminal trial.
    Williams KG
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1993 Sep; 50(4):1937-9. PubMed ID: 11660177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. AAPL Practice Guideline for the Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation of Competence to Stand Trial: an American legal perspective.
    Fitch WL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 18086744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Woodland v. Angus.
    U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D
    Fed Suppl; 1993 Mar; 820():1497-519. PubMed ID: 11648607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial.
    Klein DW
    Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002; 55(1):165-218. PubMed ID: 12680366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Commentary: UK perspective on competency to stand trial.
    Exworthy T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):466-71. PubMed ID: 17185475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Outcome of hospitalization for defendants found incompetent to stand trial.
    Nicholson RA; McNulty JL
    Behav Sci Law; 1992; 10(3):371-83. PubMed ID: 10148855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A shooting on Capitol Hill: "The Ruby Satellite System," mental illness, and failure of the American legal system.
    Cohen PJ
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2001 Dec; 11(4):391-400. PubMed ID: 11838511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Indiana v. Davis: revisiting due process rights of permanently incompetent defendants.
    Morris DR; Parker GF
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(3):380-5. PubMed ID: 19767504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.