172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12809411)
21. STARD statement: still room for improvement in the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Bossuyt PM
Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):713-4. PubMed ID: 18710968
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. There is nothing staid about STARD: progress in the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Johnston KC; Holloway RG
Neurology; 2006 Sep; 67(5):740-1. PubMed ID: 16966532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: no change since STARD statement publication--before-and-after study.
Wilczynski NL
Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):817-23. PubMed ID: 18710977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.
Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC;
Clin Radiol; 2003 Aug; 58(8):575-80. PubMed ID: 12887949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [How to use the STARD statement and the QUADAS-2 tool?].
Cohen J; Bossuyt P; Levy C; Chalumeau M; Martinot A; Launay E
Arch Pediatr; 2015 May; 22(5 Suppl 1):190-1. PubMed ID: 26112586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Critical review of a paper addressing the assessment of a diagnostic procedure].
François P; Labarère J
Rev Prat; 2010 Nov; 60(9):1278-80. PubMed ID: 21328867
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group.
Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC; Lijmer JG;
Croat Med J; 2003 Oct; 44(5):639-50. PubMed ID: 14515429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Improving reports of studies of diagnostic tests: the STARD initiative.
Rennie D
JAMA; 2003 Jan; 289(1):89-90. PubMed ID: 12503983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [New guidelines for better documentation of survey methodology and results].
Lindstedt G; Eliasson M
Lakartidningen; 2005 Mar 7-13; 102(10):748, 750, 752-3. PubMed ID: 15839166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies.
Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig L; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC; Kressel HY; Rifai N; Golub RM; Altman DG; Hooft L; Korevaar DA; Cohen JF;
BMJ; 2015 Oct; 351():h5527. PubMed ID: 26511519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Compliance with STARD checklist among studies of coronary CT angiography: systematic review.
Walther S; Schueler S; Tackmann R; Schuetz GM; Schlattmann P; Dewey M
Radiology; 2014 Apr; 271(1):74-86. PubMed ID: 24475846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evidence-based laboratory medicine: addressing bias, generalisability and applicability in studies on diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.
McQueen M
Clin Biochem; 2003 Feb; 36(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 12587604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Sources of bias in diagnostic accuracy studies and the diagnostic process.
Furukawa TA; Guyatt GH
CMAJ; 2006 Feb; 174(4):481-2. PubMed ID: 16477059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group.
Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC;
Croat Med J; 2003 Oct; 44(5):635-8. PubMed ID: 14515428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.
Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC;
Ann Clin Biochem; 2003 Jul; 40(Pt 4):357-63. PubMed ID: 12880535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quality of reporting of test accuracy studies in reproductive medicine: impact of the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative.
Coppus SF; van der Veen F; Bossuyt PM; Mol BW
Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1321-9. PubMed ID: 16978620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Reproducibility of the STARD checklist: an instrument to assess the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Smidt N; Rutjes AW; van der Windt DA; Ostelo RW; Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bouter LM; de Vet HC
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Mar; 6():12. PubMed ID: 16539705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Quality of reporting of studies evaluating time to diagnosis: a systematic review in paediatrics.
Launay E; Morfouace M; Deneux-Tharaux C; Gras le-Guen C; Ravaud P; Chalumeau M
Arch Dis Child; 2014 Mar; 99(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 24265414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Diagnostic studies should follow international guidelines. Planning and evaluation requires theoretical and practical considerations].
Björk J; Hellström M; Mejare I; Nyman U
Lakartidningen; 2013 Mar 13-19; 110(11):562-5. PubMed ID: 23596850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [The evaluation of the methodology in studies about diagnostic test in "Anales Española de Pediatria"].
González de Dios J
An Esp Pediatr; 1999 Nov; 51(5):461-8. PubMed ID: 10652795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
