These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12809433)

  • 1. Metabolic efficiency in response to environmental agents predicts hormesis and invalidates the linear no-threshold premise: ionizing radiation as a case study.
    Parsons PA
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2003; 33(3-4):443-9. PubMed ID: 12809433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Energy, stress and the invalid linear no-threshold premise: a generalization illustrated by ionizing radiation.
    Parsons PA
    Biogerontology; 2003; 4(4):227-31. PubMed ID: 14501187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hormesis: an adaptive expectation with emphasis on ionizing radiation.
    Parsons PA
    J Appl Toxicol; 2000; 20(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 10715607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A brief review of radiation hormesis.
    Jolly D; Meyer J
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2009 Dec; 32(4):180-7. PubMed ID: 20169836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The hormetic zone: an ecological and evolutionary perspective based upon habitat characteristics and fitness selection.
    Parsons PA
    Q Rev Biol; 2001 Dec; 76(4):459-67. PubMed ID: 11783398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiation, ecology and the invalid LNT model: the evolutionary imperative.
    Parsons PA
    Dose Response; 2006 Sep; 4(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 18648598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiation hormesis: challenging LNT theory via ecological and evolutionary considerations.
    Parsons PA
    Health Phys; 2002 Apr; 82(4):513-6. PubMed ID: 11906140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The linear no-threshold model is less realistic than threshold or hormesis-based models: An evolutionary perspective.
    Costantini D; Borremans B
    Chem Biol Interact; 2019 Mar; 301():26-33. PubMed ID: 30342016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiation hormesis: an ecological and energetic perspective.
    Parsons PA
    Med Hypotheses; 2001 Sep; 57(3):277-9. PubMed ID: 11516217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Exposure of healthcare personnel to ionizing radiation in the light of radiation hormesis hypothesis].
    Kraska A; Bilski B
    Med Pr; 2012; 63(3):371-6. PubMed ID: 22880457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The threshold vs LNT showdown: Dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 2. How a mistake led BEIR I to adopt LNT.
    Calabrese EJ
    Environ Res; 2017 Apr; 154():452-458. PubMed ID: 27974149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interplay of immune modulation, adaptive response and hormesis: Suggestive of threshold for clinical manifestation of effects of ionizing radiation at low doses?
    Chaurasia RK; Sapra BK; Aswal DK
    Sci Total Environ; 2024 Mar; 917():170178. PubMed ID: 38280586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The challenges of defining hormesis in epidemiological studies: The case of radiation hormesis.
    Iavicoli I; Fontana L; Santocono C; Guarino D; Laudiero M; Calabrese EJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Dec; 902():166030. PubMed ID: 37544458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiation hormesis--a remedy for fear.
    Jaworowski Z
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2010 Apr; 29(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 20332170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are We Approaching the End of the Linear No-Threshold Era?
    Doss M
    J Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1786-1793. PubMed ID: 30262515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hormesis and radiation safety norms: Comments for an update.
    Jargin SV
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2018 Nov; 37(11):1233-1243. PubMed ID: 29607734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hormesis and radiation safety norms.
    Jargin SV
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2012 Jul; 31(7):671-5. PubMed ID: 22249392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Non-monotonous dose-response relationship in the region of low doses of ionizing radiation].
    Kolomiĭtseva IK
    Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2003; 43(2):179-81. PubMed ID: 12754804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The threshold vs LNT showdown: Dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 1. The Russell-Muller debate.
    Calabrese EJ
    Environ Res; 2017 Apr; 154():435-451. PubMed ID: 28109526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biologic responses to low doses of ionizing radiation: Detriment versus hormesis. Part 2. Dose responses of organisms.
    Pollycove M; Feinendegen LE
    J Nucl Med; 2001 Sep; 42(9):26N-32N, 37N. PubMed ID: 11554390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.