BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12809542)

  • 21. Development and validation of personal monitoring methods for low levels of acrylonitrile in workplace atmosphere: I. Test atmosphere generation and solvent desorption methods.
    Melcher RG; Borders RA; Coyne LB
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1986 Mar; 47(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 3706140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A diffusive sampler for personal monitoring of toluene diisocyanate (TDI) exposure; Part II: Laboratory and field evaluation of the dosimeter.
    Rando RJ; Hammad YY; Chang SN
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1989 Jan; 50(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 2539006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Control of workers' exposure to xylene in a pesticide production factory.
    Mohammadyan M; Baharfar Y
    Int J Occup Environ Health; 2015; 21(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 25487643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Personal exposure to ultrafine particles in the workplace: exploring sampling techniques and strategies.
    Brouwer DH; Gijsbers JH; Lurvink MW
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jul; 48(5):439-53. PubMed ID: 15240340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Personal monitoring instrument for the selective measurement of multiple organic vapors.
    Park J; Zhang GZ; Zellers ET
    AIHAJ; 2000; 61(2):192-204. PubMed ID: 10782191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Near-infrared (NIR) monitoring of H2O2 vapor concentration during vapor hydrogen peroxide (VHP) sterilisation.
    Corveleyn S; Vandenbossche GM; Remon JP
    Pharm Res; 1997 Mar; 14(3):294-8. PubMed ID: 9098869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Occupational exposures to styrene vapor in a manufacturing plant for fiber-reinforced composite wind turbine blades.
    Hammond D; Garcia A; Feng HA
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Jul; 55(6):591-600. PubMed ID: 21597049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Field validation of passive monitors for the determination of employee exposures to methylene chloride in pharmaceutical production facilities.
    Charron KA; Puskar MA; Levine SP
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 May; 59(5):353-8. PubMed ID: 9858977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Exposure Assessment in a Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Primary Manufacturer.
    Kouassi S; Catto C; Ostiguy C; L'Espérance G; Kroeger J; Debia M
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2017 Mar; 61(2):260-266. PubMed ID: 28395348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of calibration environment on the performance of direct-reading organic vapor monitors.
    LeBouf RF; Slaven JE; Coffey CC
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2013 May; 63(5):528-33. PubMed ID: 23786144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Chamber evaluation of a portable GC with tunable retention and microsensor-array detection for indoor air quality monitoring.
    Lu CJ; Jin C; Zellers ET
    J Environ Monit; 2006 Feb; 8(2):270-8. PubMed ID: 16470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sensor-triggered sampling to determine instantaneous airborne vapor exposure concentrations.
    Smith PA; Simmons MK; Toone P
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2018 Jun; 15(6):510-517. PubMed ID: 29580177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Application of a newly developed hydrogen peroxide vapor phase sensor to HPV sterilizer.
    Taizo I; Sinichi A; Kawamura K
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 1998; 52(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 9542409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An analysis of workplace exposures to benzene over four decades at a petrochemical processing and manufacturing facility (1962-1999).
    Sahmel J; Devlin K; Burns A; Ferracini T; Ground M; Paustenbach D
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2013; 76(12):723-46. PubMed ID: 23980839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Field comparison of personal samplers for inhalable dust.
    Vaughan NP; Chalmers CP; Botham RA
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1990 Dec; 34(6):553-73. PubMed ID: 2291580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36.
    Ragland NH; Miedel EL; Gomez JM; Engelman RW
    J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci; 2017 Nov; 56(6):742-751. PubMed ID: 29256369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Charge-based personal aerosol samplers.
    Fierz M; Keller A; Burtscher H
    Inhal Toxicol; 2009 Jul; 21 Suppl 1():30-4. PubMed ID: 19558231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of calibration and environmental condition on the performance of direct-reading organic vapor monitors.
    Coffey C; LeBouf R; Lee L; Slaven J; Martin S
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(11):670-80. PubMed ID: 23016630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Alarming readings.
    Rekus J
    Occup Health Saf; 1994 Oct; 63(10):59-62, 64, 66-7. PubMed ID: 9156445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.