These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12810611)

  • 1. Determination of the upper limit of vulnerability using implantable cardioverter-defibrillator electrograms.
    Swerdlow C; Shivkumar K; Zhang J
    Circulation; 2003 Jun; 107(24):3028-33. PubMed ID: 12810611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Upper limit of vulnerability is a good estimator of shock strength associated with 90% probability of successful defibrillation in humans with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.
    Swerdlow CD; Ahern T; Kass RM; Davie S; Mandel WJ; Chen PS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 27(5):1112-8. PubMed ID: 8609329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic determination of timing intervals for upper limit of vulnerability using ICD electrograms.
    Shehata M; Belk P; Kremers M; Saba S; Cao J; Swerdlow CD
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Jun; 31(6):691-700. PubMed ID: 18507541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of the defibrillation threshold using the upper limit of vulnerability following defibrillator implantation.
    Kirilmaz A; Dokumaci B; Uzun M; Kilicaslan F; Dinckal MH; Yucel O; Karaca M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Jun; 28(6):498-505. PubMed ID: 15955181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using the upper limit of vulnerability to assess defibrillation efficacy at implantation of ICDs.
    Swerdlow CD; Shehata M; Chen PS
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Feb; 30(2):258-70. PubMed ID: 17338725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inductionless or limited shock testing is possible in most patients with implantable cardioverter- defibrillators/cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: results of the multicenter ASSURE Study (Arrhythmia Single Shock Defibrillation Threshold Testing Versus Upper Limit of Vulnerability: Risk Reduction Evaluation With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantations).
    Day JD; Doshi RN; Belott P; Birgersdotter-Green U; Behboodikhah M; Ott P; Glatter KA; Tobias S; Frumin H; Lee BK; Merillat J; Wiener I; Wang S; Grogin H; Chun S; Patrawalla R; Crandall B; Osborn JS; Weiss JP; Lappe DL; Neuman S
    Circulation; 2007 May; 115(18):2382-9. PubMed ID: 17470697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Relationship Between Cardiac Vulnerability and Restitution Properties of the Ventricular Activation Recovery Interval.
    Yamashita S; Yoshida A; Fukuzawa K; Nakanishi T; Matsumoto A; Konishi H; Ichibori H; Hyogo K; Imada H; Hirata K
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Jul; 26(7):768-73. PubMed ID: 25810143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Upper limit of vulnerability determination during implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement to minimize ventricular fibrillation inductions.
    Glikson M; Gurevitz OT; Trusty JM; Sharma V; Luria DM; Eldar M; Shen WK; Rea RF; Hammill SC; Friedman PA
    Am J Cardiol; 2004 Dec; 94(11):1445-9. PubMed ID: 15566924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determination of ventricular vulnerable period and ventricular fibrillation threshold by use of T-wave shocks in patients undergoing implantation of cardioverter/defibrillators.
    Hou CJ; Chang-Sing P; Flynn E; Martinez L; Peterson J; Ottoboni LK; Liem LB; Sung RJ
    Circulation; 1995 Nov; 92(9):2558-64. PubMed ID: 7586357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Successful implantation of cardiac defibrillators without induction of ventricular fibrillation using upper limit of vulnerability testing.
    Green UB; Garg A; Al-Kandari F; Ungab G; Tone L; Feld GK
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2003 Feb; 8(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 12652181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reducing ICD Test Shocks with a Simplified Upper Limit of Vulnerability.
    Pittaro M; Deforge W; Kroll MW
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2016 Jul; 39(7):652-7. PubMed ID: 27019321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation of acute and chronic defibrillation threshold with upper limit of vulnerability determined in normal sinus rhythm.
    Birgersdotter-Green U; Undesser K; Fujimura O; Feld GK; Kass RM; Mandel WJ; Peter CT; Chen PS
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Jul; 3(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 10387143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of drive cycle length on initiation of ventricular fibrillation during implantable cardioverter defibrillator threshold testing.
    Sanghvi NK; Lelorier P; Gururaj AV; Monahan KM
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Sep; 29(9):926-9. PubMed ID: 16981914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive value of ventricular arrhythmia inducibility for subsequent ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation in Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) II patients.
    Daubert JP; Zareba W; Hall WJ; Schuger C; Corsello A; Leon AR; Andrews ML; McNitt S; Huang DT; Moss AJ;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Jan; 47(1):98-107. PubMed ID: 16386671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated vulnerability testing identifies patients with inadequate defibrillation safety margin.
    Birgersdotter-Green U; Ruetz LL; Anand K; Monir G; Abeyratne AI; Bailey JR; Shorofsky SR; Hsia HH; Friedman PA
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2012 Dec; 5(6):1073-80. PubMed ID: 23051838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Programming of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators on the basis of the upper limit of vulnerability.
    Swerdlow CD; Peter CT; Kass RM; Gang ES; Mandel WJ; Hwang C; Martin DJ; Chen PS
    Circulation; 1997 Mar; 95(6):1497-504. PubMed ID: 9118518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The zone of vulnerability to T wave shocks in humans.
    Swerdlow CD; Martin DJ; Kass RM; Davie S; Mandel WJ; Gang ES; Chen PS
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Feb; 8(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 9147699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of induction method on defibrillation threshold and ventricular fibrillation cycle length.
    Zima E; Gergely M; Soós P; Gellér LA; Nemes A; Acsády G; Merkely B
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Apr; 17(4):377-81. PubMed ID: 16643358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of programmed number of intervals to detect ventricular fibrillation on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator aborted and unnecessary shocks.
    Gunderson BD; Abeyratne AI; Olson WH; Swerdlow CD
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Feb; 30(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 17338710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implantation of cardioverter defibrillators without induction of ventricular fibrillation.
    Swerdlow CD
    Circulation; 2001 May; 103(17):2159-64. PubMed ID: 11331256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.