BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12811004)

  • 21. Deficit in the preattentive processing of syllabic duration and VOT in children with dyslexia.
    Chobert J; François C; Habib M; Besson M
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(8):2044-55. PubMed ID: 22595658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. No effect of gender on tonal and phonetic mismatch negativity in normal adults assessed by a high-resolution EEG recording.
    Kasai K; Nakagome K; Iwanami A; Fukuda M; Itoh K; Koshida I; Kato N
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2002 May; 13(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 11918996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fast parametric evaluation of central speech-sound processing with mismatch negativity (MMN).
    Pakarinen S; Teinonen T; Shestakova A; Kwon MS; Kujala T; Hämäläinen H; Näätänen R; Huotilainen M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jan; 87(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 23201145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Asymmetries in the processing of vowel height.
    Scharinger M; Monahan PJ; Idsardi WJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):903-18. PubMed ID: 22232394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sound complexity and 'speechness' effects on pre-attentive auditory discrimination in children.
    Ceponiene R; Yaguchi K; Shestakova A; Alku P; Suominen K; Näätänen R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2002 Mar; 43(3):199-211. PubMed ID: 11850086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Phonetic processing in children with cochlear implants: an auditory event-related potentials study.
    Henkin Y; Kileny PR; Hildesheimer M; Kishon-Rabin L
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 18595188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Are different kinds of acoustic features processed differently for speech and non-speech sounds?
    Jaramillo M; Ilvonen T; Kujala T; Alku P; Tervaniemi M; Alho K
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2001 Dec; 12(3):459-66. PubMed ID: 11689306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
    Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hyperarticulation of vowels enhances phonetic change responses in both native and non-native speakers of English: evidence from an auditory event-related potential study.
    Uther M; Giannakopoulou A; Iverson P
    Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 1470():52-8. PubMed ID: 22771705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mismatch negativity in school-age children to speech stimuli that are just perceptibly different.
    Kraus N; McGee T; Micco A; Sharma A; Carrell T; Nicol T
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 7681753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Vowel-speech versus pure-tone processing in healthy subjects.
    Iino H; Ohta K; Hara K; Miyajima M; Hara M; Matsushima E; Matsuura M
    Neurosci Res; 2018 Dec; 137():43-48. PubMed ID: 29630919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Segmental and suprasegmental features in speech perception in Cantonese-speaking second graders: an ERP study.
    Tong X; McBride C; Lee CY; Zhang J; Shuai L; Maurer U; Chung KK
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Nov; 51(11):1158-68. PubMed ID: 24953142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Auditory event-related potentials during phonetic and semantic processing in children.
    Henkin Y; Kishon-Rabin L; Gadoth N; Pratt H
    Audiol Neurootol; 2002; 7(4):228-39. PubMed ID: 12097722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Linguistic multi-feature paradigm as an eligible measure of central auditory processing and novelty detection in 2-year-old children.
    Niemitalo-Haapola E; Lapinlampi S; Kujala T; Alku P; Kujala T; Suominen K; Jansson-Verkasalo E
    Cogn Neurosci; 2013; 4(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 24073735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Inequality across consonantal contrasts in speech perception: evidence from mismatch negativity.
    Cornell SA; Lahiri A; Eulitz C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):757-72. PubMed ID: 23276108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Processing of word stress related acoustic information: A multi-feature MMN study.
    Honbolygó F; Kolozsvári O; Csépe V
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Aug; 118():9-17. PubMed ID: 28549538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Speech-feature discrimination in children with Asperger syndrome as determined with the multi-feature mismatch negativity paradigm.
    Kujala T; Kuuluvainen S; Saalasti S; Jansson-Verkasalo E; Wendt LV; Lepistö T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Sep; 121(9):1410-1419. PubMed ID: 20382070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Differences in sensory processing of German vowels and physically matched non-speech sounds as revealed by the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the human event-related brain potential (ERP).
    Christmann CA; Berti S; Steinbrink C; Lachmann T
    Brain Lang; 2014 Sep; 136():8-18. PubMed ID: 25108306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. MMN to natural Arabic CV syllables: 2 - cross language study.
    Zeftawi MS
    Hear Res; 2005 Dec; 210(1-2):24-9. PubMed ID: 16055287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Automatic processing of tones and speech stimuli in children with specific language impairment.
    Uwer R; Albrecht R; von Suchodoletz W
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2002 Aug; 44(8):527-32. PubMed ID: 12206618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.