416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12811853)
1. Cytohistologic correlation rates between conventional Papanicolaou smears and ThinPrep cervical cytology: a comparison.
Chacho MS; Mattie ME; Schwartz PE
Cancer; 2003 Jun; 99(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 12811853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ThinPrep Papanicolaou testing to reduce false-negative cervical cytology.
Linder J; Zahniser D
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Feb; 122(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 9499356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Severe cervical glandular cell lesions and severe cervical combined lesions: predictive value of the papanicolaou smear.
van Aspert-van Erp AJ; Smedts FM; Vooijs GP
Cancer; 2004 Aug; 102(4):210-7. PubMed ID: 15368312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ThinPrep detection of cervical and endometrial adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.
Schorge JO; Hossein Saboorian M; Hynan L; Ashfaq R
Cancer; 2002 Dec; 96(6):338-43. PubMed ID: 12478681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ThinPrep Pap Test promotes detection of glandular lesions of the endocervix.
Bai H; Sung CJ; Steinhoff MM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Jul; 23(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 10907926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of the ThinPrep monolayer technique and conventional cervical Pap smears in a high-risk population using the Munich II nomenclature].
Lellé RJ; Cordes A; Regidor M; Maier E; Flenker H
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2007; 47(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 17440269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer.
Nieminen P; Vuorma S; Viikki M; Hakama M; Anttila A
BJOG; 2004 Aug; 111(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 15270934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of p16INK4a as a diagnostic tool in the triage of Pap smears demonstrating atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Duncan L; Jacob S; Hubbard E
Cancer; 2008 Feb; 114(1):34-48. PubMed ID: 18186493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. One hundred percent thorough quality control rescreening of liquid-based monolayers in cervicovaginal cytopathology.
Rowe LR; Marshall CJ; Bentz JS
Cancer; 2002 Dec; 96(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 12478679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ThinPrep Pap Test. Accuracy for glandular disease.
Ashfaq R; Gibbons D; Vela C; Saboorian MH; Iliya F
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 9987455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Usefulness of liquid-based cytology specimens for the immunocytochemical study of p16 expression and human papillomavirus testing: a comparative study using simultaneously sampled histology materials.
Yoshida T; Fukuda T; Sano T; Kanuma T; Owada N; Nakajima T
Cancer; 2004 Apr; 102(2):100-8. PubMed ID: 15098254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Applicative aspects of liquid-based cytology in cervical cancer screening].
Liverani M; De Paola F; Danesi S; Fedriga R; Dalbuoni V; Agnoletti R; Amadori AR; Mirra F; Bonoli W; Saragoni L
Pathologica; 2006 Dec; 98(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 17285839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative study of the ThinPrep Pap test and conventional cytology results in a Canadian cohort.
Duggan MA; Khalil M; Brasher PM; Nation JG
Cytopathology; 2006 Apr; 17(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 16548991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of ThinPrep liquid-based cervical cytology in comparison with conventionally prepared Papanicolaou smears: a quantitative survey.
Abulafia O; Pezzullo JC; Sherer DM
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Jul; 90(1):137-44. PubMed ID: 12821354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. False-positive squamous cell carcinoma in cervical smears: cytologic-histologic correlation in 19 cases.
Levine PH; Elgert PA; Mittal K
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jan; 28(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 12508178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Review of negative and low-grade cervical smears in women with invasive cervical cancer after the first 3 years of the national cervical screening programme in Slovenia.
Repše-Fokter A; Pogačnik A; Snoj V; Primic-Žakelj M; Fležar MS
Cytopathology; 2012 Feb; 23(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 20964743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Significance of atypia in conventional Papanicolaou smears and liquid-based cytology: a follow-up study.
Schledermann D; Ejersbo D; Hoelund B
Cytopathology; 2004 Jun; 15(3):148-53. PubMed ID: 15165271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cytopathological pattern of cervical Pap smear according to the Bethesda system in Southwestern Saudi Arabia.
Elhakeem HA; Al-Ghamdi AS; Al-Maghrabi JA
Saudi Med J; 2005 Apr; 26(4):588-92. PubMed ID: 15900366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of ThinPrep preparation of cervical smears: a 1,000-case, investigator-sponsored study.
Awen C; Hathway S; Eddy W; Voskuil R; Janes C
Diagn Cytopathol; 1994; 11(1):33-6; discussion 36-7. PubMed ID: 7956657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the cervical cytology test using the PAPNET method and conventional microscopy.
Weissbrod D; Torres M; Rodríguez A; Ureña I; Estrada J; Reyes ME; Carreto AJ
Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1996 Dec; 30(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 9041745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
