159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12812180)
1. The front lines of biowarfare: today's anti-terrorism effort casts early test subjects in new light.
Snyder D
Washington Post; 2003 May; ():B1, B5. PubMed ID: 12812180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical testing: issues and ethics.
Mossman KL
Forum Appl Res Public Policy; 1997; 12(3):90-101. PubMed ID: 12962094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Balancing pluralism and the common good: a look at open-air experiments of biowarfare agents.
Trotter G
Account Res; 2003; 10(2):109-21. PubMed ID: 14577423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. U.S. troops were subjected to a wider toxic testing.
Shanker T
N Y Times Web; 2002 Oct; ():A18. PubMed ID: 12474840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. U.S. tested a nerve gas in Hawaii.
Shanker T
N Y Times Web; 2002 Nov; ():A24. PubMed ID: 12474844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Secret human experiments test trust in government.
Guttman D
Forum Appl Res Public Policy; 1997; 12(3):109-14. PubMed ID: 12962097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Old legacies and new paradigms: confusing "research" and "treatment" and its consequences in responding to emergent health threats.
Javitt GH
J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(1):38-70. PubMed ID: 16538801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. How does an accident become an experiment? Secret science and the exposure of the public to biological warfare agents.
Balmer B
Sci Cult (Lond); 2004 Jun; 13(2):197-228. PubMed ID: 15988847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Bearing true faith and allegiance? Allowing recovery for soldiers under fire in military experiments that violate the Nuremberg Code.
O'Connor MJ
Suffolk Transnatl Law R; 2002; 25(3):649-86. PubMed ID: 16514768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Japanese germ-war atrocities: a half-century of stonewalling the world.
Blumenthal R; Miller J
N Y Times Web; 1999 Mar; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11648104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Disclosure and consent: through the Cold War prism.
Guttman D
Account Res; 1998 Jan; 6(1-2):1-14. PubMed ID: 11660585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Human subjects research. Panel blasts ethics, science of 1940s Guatemala studies.
Kaiser J
Science; 2011 Sep; 333(6047):1211. PubMed ID: 21885749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Military personnel may have been human subjects without their informed consent.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Aug; 18(8):9. PubMed ID: 15119340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Your country needs you.
Edwards R
New Sci; 2000 Nov; 168(2264):11. PubMed ID: 12549450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. FDA seeks public comment on informed consent rules in combat situations.
Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(5):43. PubMed ID: 11645003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A public culture for guinea pigs: US human research subjects after the Tuskegee study.
Weinstein M
Sci Cult (Lond); 2001 Jun; 10(2):195-223. PubMed ID: 15971362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cold war at Porton Down: informed consent in Britain's biological and chemical warfare experiments.
Schmidt U
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2006; 15(4):366-80. PubMed ID: 17066763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Experimental drugs are linked to ills of Gulf War veterans.
Leary WE
N Y Times Web; 1994 May; ():12. PubMed ID: 11647031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Judge backs Gulf use of unapproved drugs.
N Y Times Web; 1991 Feb; ():A9. PubMed ID: 11646822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Informed consent and investigational new drug abuses in the U.S. military.
Cummings ML
Account Res; 2002; 9(2):93-103. PubMed ID: 12625353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
