131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12812922)
1. Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex ultrasonography with digital subtraction angiography.
Saloner D
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003; 24(6):1034-5. PubMed ID: 12812922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography with digital subtraction angiography.
Borisch I; Horn M; Butz B; Zorger N; Draganski B; Hoelscher T; Bogdahn U; Link J
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003; 24(6):1117-22. PubMed ID: 12812936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation. Can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography?
Patel MR; Kuntz KM; Klufas RA; Kim D; Kramer J; Polak JF; Skillman JJ; Whittemore AD; Edelman RR; Kent KC
Stroke; 1995 Oct; 26(10):1753-8. PubMed ID: 7570720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Carotid Artery Stenosis: Competition between CT Angiography and MR Angiography.
Randoux B; Marro B; Marsault C
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2004 Apr; 25(4):663-4; author reply 664. PubMed ID: 15090363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review.
Nederkoorn PJ; van der Graaf Y; Hunink MG
Stroke; 2003 May; 34(5):1324-32. PubMed ID: 12690221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gadofosveset-enhanced MR angiography of carotid arteries: does steady-state imaging improve accuracy of first-pass imaging? Comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography.
Anzidei M; Napoli A; Marincola BC; Nofroni I; Geiger D; Zaccagna F; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiology; 2009 May; 251(2):457-66. PubMed ID: 19401574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography, duplex ultrasound examination with surgical and histological findings of atherosclerotic carotid bifurcation disease.
Liberopoulos K; Kaponis A; Kokkinis K; Pagratis N; Nicolakopoulou Z; Douskou M; Stringaris K; Clonaris C; Balas P
Int Angiol; 1996 Jun; 15(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 8803637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM
Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Critical review of non- or minimally invasive methods (duplex ultrasonography, MR- and CT-angiography) for evaluating stenosis of the proximal internal carotid artery.
Long A; Lepoutre A; Corbillon E; Branchereau A
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2002 Jul; 24(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 12127847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Carotid bifurcation stenosis: a comparative study between MR angiography and duplex scanning with respect to digital subtraction angiography.
Carriero A; Ucchino S; Magarelli N; Legnini M; Macrì MA; Napolitano AM; Bonomo L
J Neuroradiol; 1995 Jun; 22(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 7629567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, duplex ultrasound, and digital subtraction angiography in assessment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis.
Young GR; Humphrey PR; Shaw MD; Nixon TE; Smith ET
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1994 Dec; 57(12):1466-78. PubMed ID: 7798975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis.
Modaresi KB; Cox TC; Summers PE; Jarosz JM; Verma H; Taylor PR; Padayachee TS
Br J Surg; 1999 Nov; 86(11):1422-6. PubMed ID: 10583289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in predicting angiographic stenosis of the internal carotid artery: linear regression analysis.
Hathout GM; Duh MJ; El-Saden SM
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 Oct; 24(9):1747-56. PubMed ID: 14561597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imaging of carotid arteries in symptomatic patients: cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies.
Buskens E; Nederkoorn PJ; Buijs-Van Der Woude T; Mali WP; Kappelle LJ; Eikelboom BC; Van Der Graaf Y; Hunink MG
Radiology; 2004 Oct; 233(1):101-12. PubMed ID: 15333770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [MR-angiography and duplex-ultrasonography: predictive reliability for angiographically determined internal carotid artery stenosis >/= 70-99%].
Wölfle KD; Schnur C; Pfadenhauer K; Bruijnen H; Bohndorf K; Loeprecht H
Zentralbl Chir; 2002 Feb; 127(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 11894206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography compared with conventional digital subtraction angiography.
Goyal M; Nicol J; Gandhi D
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2004 Apr; 55(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 15131933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Alvarez-Linera J; Benito-León J; Escribano J; Campollo J; Gesto R
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 May; 24(5):1012-9. PubMed ID: 12748115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The evaluation of 3DFT time-of-flight MR-angiography versus angiography in the study of carotid atheromatous lesions with a review of the literature].
Auffray-Calvier E; Desal HA; Viarouge MP; Havet T; De Kersaint-Gilly A
J Neuroradiol; 1995 Dec; 22(4):272-87. PubMed ID: 8636803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Duplex accuracy compared with angiography in the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Trial for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis.
Srinivasan J; Mayberg MR; Weiss DG; Eskridge J
Neurosurgery; 1995 Apr; 36(4):648-53; discussion 653-5. PubMed ID: 7596492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of subjective visual impression for evaluation with digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
U-King-Im JM; Graves MJ; Cross JJ; Higgins NJ; Wat J; Trivedi RA; Tang T; Howarth SP; Kirkpatrick PJ; Antoun NM; Gillard JH
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):213-22. PubMed ID: 17507721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
