189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12812936)
1. Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography with digital subtraction angiography.
Borisch I; Horn M; Butz B; Zorger N; Draganski B; Hoelscher T; Bogdahn U; Link J
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003; 24(6):1117-22. PubMed ID: 12812936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of extracranial carotid artery disease.
Serfaty JM; Chirossel P; Chevallier JM; Ecochard R; Froment JC; Douek PC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Aug; 175(2):455-63. PubMed ID: 10915694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Common carotid artery bifurcation: preliminary results of CT angiography and color-coded duplex sonography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Link J; Brossmann J; Penselin V; Glüer CC; Heller M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):361-5. PubMed ID: 9016207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Alvarez-Linera J; Benito-León J; Escribano J; Campollo J; Gesto R
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 May; 24(5):1012-9. PubMed ID: 12748115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [MR-angiography and duplex-ultrasonography: predictive reliability for angiographically determined internal carotid artery stenosis >/= 70-99%].
Wölfle KD; Schnur C; Pfadenhauer K; Bruijnen H; Bohndorf K; Loeprecht H
Zentralbl Chir; 2002 Feb; 127(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 11894206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of subjective visual impression for evaluation with digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
U-King-Im JM; Graves MJ; Cross JJ; Higgins NJ; Wat J; Trivedi RA; Tang T; Howarth SP; Kirkpatrick PJ; Antoun NM; Gillard JH
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):213-22. PubMed ID: 17507721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography.
Remonda L; Senn P; Barth A; Arnold M; Lövblad KO; Schroth G
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2002 Feb; 23(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 11847044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading.
Anzalone N; Scomazzoni F; Castellano R; Strada L; Righi C; Politi LS; Kirchin MA; Chiesa R; Scotti G
Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):204-13. PubMed ID: 15955853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM
Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-grade stenoses of the internal carotid artery: comparison of high-resolution contrast enhanced 3D MRA, duplex sonography and power Doppler imaging.
Clevert DA; Johnson T; Michaely H; Jung EM; Flach PM; Strautz TI; Clevert DA; Reiser M; Schoenberg SO
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 60(3):379-86. PubMed ID: 16920314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex ultrasonography with digital subtraction angiography.
Saloner D
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003; 24(6):1034-5. PubMed ID: 12812922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis.
Nederkoorn PJ; Elgersma OE; van der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; Kappelle LJ; Mali WP
Radiology; 2003 Sep; 228(3):677-82. PubMed ID: 12869686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments.
Cassola N; Baptista-Silva JC; Nakano LC; Flumignan CD; Sesso R; Vasconcelos V; Carvas Junior N; Flumignan RL
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Jul; 7(7):CD013172. PubMed ID: 35815652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imaging of carotid arteries in symptomatic patients: cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies.
Buskens E; Nederkoorn PJ; Buijs-Van Der Woude T; Mali WP; Kappelle LJ; Eikelboom BC; Van Der Graaf Y; Hunink MG
Radiology; 2004 Oct; 233(1):101-12. PubMed ID: 15333770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Assessment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis by duplex scanning magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography: a comparative study].
Guo D; Wang Y; Fu W
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Feb; 80(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 11798743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gadofosveset-enhanced MR angiography of carotid arteries: does steady-state imaging improve accuracy of first-pass imaging? Comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography.
Anzidei M; Napoli A; Marincola BC; Nofroni I; Geiger D; Zaccagna F; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiology; 2009 May; 251(2):457-66. PubMed ID: 19401574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in predicting angiographic stenosis of the internal carotid artery: linear regression analysis.
Hathout GM; Duh MJ; El-Saden SM
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 Oct; 24(9):1747-56. PubMed ID: 14561597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [3D-CT angiography and duplex sonography compared to arteriography in carotid stenoses].
Link J; Müller-Hülsbeck S; Wesner F; Höpfner M; Schwarzenberg H; Heller M
Rofo; 1997 Jan; 166(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 9072101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preoperative diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of noninvasive testing.
Nederkoorn PJ; Mali WP; Eikelboom BC; Elgersma OE; Buskens E; Hunink MG; Kappelle LJ; Buijs PC; Wüst AF; van der Lugt A; van der Graaf Y
Stroke; 2002 Aug; 33(8):2003-8. PubMed ID: 12154253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography.
Randoux B; Marro B; Koskas F; Duyme M; Sahel M; Zouaoui A; Marsault C
Radiology; 2001 Jul; 220(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 11425993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
