These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12814099)
1. Causal judgment as evaluation of evidence: the use of confirmation and disconfirmatory information. White PA Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Apr; 56(3):491-513. PubMed ID: 12814099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Judgement of two causal candidates from contingency information: II. Effects of information about one cause on judgements of the other cause. White PA Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Aug; 58(6):999-1021. PubMed ID: 16194945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceiving a strong causal relation in a weak contingency: further investigation of the evidential evaluation model of causal judgement. White PA Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jan; 55(1):97-114. PubMed ID: 11873858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cue interaction effects in causal judgement: an interpretation in terms of the evidential evaluation model. White PA Q J Exp Psychol B; 2005 Apr; 58(2):99-140. PubMed ID: 16095042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Causal judgement from contingency information: judging interactions between two causal candidates. White PA Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jul; 55(3):819-38. PubMed ID: 12188515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of wording and stimulus format on the use of contingency information in causal judgment. White PA Mem Cognit; 2003 Mar; 31(2):231-42. PubMed ID: 12749465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Causal judgment from contingency information: a systematic test of the pCI rule. White PA Mem Cognit; 2004 Apr; 32(3):353-68. PubMed ID: 15285120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Normative and descriptive accounts of the influence of power and contingency on causal judgement. Perales JC; Shanks DR Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Aug; 56(6):977-1007. PubMed ID: 12881167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Judgement of two causal candidates from contingency information: effects of relative prevalence of the two causes. White P Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Aug; 57(6):961-91. PubMed ID: 15370512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accounting for occurrences: an explanation for some novel tendencies in causal judgment from contingency information. White PA Mem Cognit; 2009 Jun; 37(4):500-13. PubMed ID: 19460956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Causal judgement from information about outcome magnitude. White PA Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(11):2268-88. PubMed ID: 23573791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Making causal judgments from the proportion of confirming instances: the pCI rule. White PA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Jul; 29(4):710-27. PubMed ID: 12924869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Weighting of contingency information in causal judgement: evidence of hypothesis dependence and use of a positive-test strategy. Mandel DR; Vartanian O Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Dec; 62(12):2388-408. PubMed ID: 19391044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accounting for occurrences: a new view of the use of contingency information in causal judgment. White PA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):204-18. PubMed ID: 18194063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Causal judgements about temporal sequences of events in single individuals. White PA Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(11):2149-74. PubMed ID: 25728947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Statistical contingency has a different impact on preparation judgements than on causal judgements. De Houwer J; Vandorpe S; Beckers T Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):418-32. PubMed ID: 17366309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Causal judgment from contingency information: the interpretation of factors common to all instances. White PA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Sep; 26(5):1083-102. PubMed ID: 11009246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conformity to the power PC theory of causal induction depends on the type of probe question. Collins DJ; Shanks DR Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Feb; 59(2):225-32. PubMed ID: 16618631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adult age differences in on-line contingency judgements. Parr WV; Mercier P Can J Exp Psychol; 1998 Sep; 52(3):147-59. PubMed ID: 9849098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictions and causal estimations are not supported by the same associative structure. Vadillo MA; Matute H Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):433-47. PubMed ID: 17366310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]