These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12814099)

  • 21. Causal judgment from contingency information: relation between subjective reports and individual tendencies in judgment.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Apr; 28(3):415-26. PubMed ID: 10881559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interpretation of ambiguous trials along with reasoning strategy is related to causal judgements in zero-contingency learning.
    Béghin G; Markovits H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Dec; 76(12):2704-2717. PubMed ID: 36718805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Instance-of-object-kind representations.
    Prasada S; Hall DG
    Cognition; 2019 Aug; 189():209-220. PubMed ID: 31002983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Judgement frequency, belief revision, and serial processing of causal information.
    Catena A; Maldonado A; Megías JL; Frese B
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2002 Jul; 55(3):267-81. PubMed ID: 12188527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A quantitative causal model theory of conditional reasoning.
    Fernbach PM; Erb CD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1327-43. PubMed ID: 23565785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Is causal induction based on causal power? Critique of Cheng (1997).
    Lober K; Shanks DR
    Psychol Rev; 2000 Jan; 107(1):195-212. PubMed ID: 10687407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Judgments of causal efficacy under constant and changing interevent contingencies.
    Katagiri M; Kao SF; Simon AM; Castro L; Wasserman EA
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):251-64. PubMed ID: 17029817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of stimulus order on discrimination processes in comparative and equality judgements: data and models.
    Dyjas O; Ulrich R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(6):1121-50. PubMed ID: 24295428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: sadder but wiser?
    Alloy LB; Abramson LY
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Dec; 108(4):441-85. PubMed ID: 528910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sample size, confidence, and contingency judgement.
    Clément M; Mercier P; Pastò L
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2002 Jun; 56(2):128-37. PubMed ID: 12066421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Singular clues to causality and their use in human causal judgment.
    White PA
    Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(1):38-75. PubMed ID: 23957568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Moral parochialism and contextual contingency across seven societies.
    Fessler DM; Barrett HC; Kanovsky M; Stich S; Holbrook C; Henrich J; Bolyanatz AH; Gervais MM; Gurven M; Kushnick G; Pisor AC; von Rueden C; Laurence S
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Aug; 282(1813):20150907. PubMed ID: 26246545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The influence of the number of relevant causes on the processing of covariation information in causal reasoning.
    Kim K; Markman AB; Kim TH
    Cogn Process; 2016 Nov; 17(4):399-413. PubMed ID: 27312597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Causal judgments about empirical information in an interrupted time series design.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jan; 70(1):18-35. PubMed ID: 26624272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Contiguity and the outcome density bias in action-outcome contingency judgements.
    Vallée-Tourangeau F; Murphy RA; Baker AG
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2005 Apr; 58(2):177-92. PubMed ID: 16095045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cue interaction and judgments of causality: contributions of causal and associative processes.
    Tangen JM; Allan LG
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 15078048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Primacy in causal strength judgments: the effect of initial evidence for generative versus inhibitory relationships.
    Dennis MJ; Ahn WK
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Jan; 29(1):152-64. PubMed ID: 11277458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Do nurses reason 'adaptively' in time limited situations: the findings of a descriptive regression analysis.
    Yang H; Thompson C; Bland M
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2014 Nov; 14():96. PubMed ID: 25398441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Inferences about unobserved causes in human contingency learning.
    Hagmayer Y; Waldmann MR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):330-55. PubMed ID: 17366304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Outcome additivity, elemental processing and blocking in human causality judgements.
    Livesey EJ; Boakes RA
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Oct; 57(4):361-79. PubMed ID: 15513261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.