176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12814111)
1. Institutional conflicts of interest and research with human subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Feb; 18(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 12814111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Court refuses to interfere with institutional review board (IRB).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Apr; 18(4):8. PubMed ID: 14603945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Bioethical malpractice: risk and responsibilities in human research.
Noah BA
J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(2):175-241. PubMed ID: 15573441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. "There is no substantive due process right to conduct human-subject research": the saga of the Minnesota Gamma Hydroxybutyrate Study.
Hammerschmidt DE
IRB; 1997; 19(3-4):13-5. PubMed ID: 11656944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Parents say federal agency helps protect researchers from more than their subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Oct; 15(10):5-6. PubMed ID: 11913435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Institutional review boards, research on children, and informed consent of parents: walking the tightrope between encouraging vital experimentation and protecting subjects' rights.
Katerberg RJ
J Coll Univ Law; 1998; 24(3):545-79. PubMed ID: 16331880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Lawsuits target medical research.
Dembner A
IRB; 2002; 24(4):14-5. PubMed ID: 13678031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Case study: institutional review board (IRB) did not know about subject problem until after study.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2006 May; 21(5):6-7. PubMed ID: 16832916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Researchers break the rules in frustration at review boards.
Giles J
Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7065):136-7. PubMed ID: 16280994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Research administrator should not serve on institutional review board.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Apr; 17(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 12374181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The basic right of human research subjects to be treated with dignity.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2004 Mar; 19(3):8. PubMed ID: 15139343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Legal liabilities in research: early lessons from North America.
Zlotnik Shaul R; Birenbaum S; Evans M
BMC Med Ethics; 2005 Jun; 6():E4. PubMed ID: 15953387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical trials litigation: practical realities as seen from the trenches.
Morreim EH
Account Res; 2005; 12(1):47-67. PubMed ID: 16021792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vulnerable subjects and Canadian research governance.
Wilson M
IRB; 2005; 27(6):9-11. PubMed ID: 16425479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. University admits research proceeded without review by an institutional review board (IRB).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Apr; 18(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 14603944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Research ethics and revised law regarding the Danish Central Scientific Ethical Committee].
Kamper-Jørgensen F
Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Jun; 166(24):2337-40. PubMed ID: 15281571
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical trials: a medical Catch-22. Researchers, institution boards must take appropriate steps to protect participants.
Serbaroli F
Mod Healthc; 2002 Oct; 32(41):23. PubMed ID: 12415995
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [The system of scientific ethical committees].
Larsen NA
Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Jun; 165(23):2412-3. PubMed ID: 12841005
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Former human subjects sue over their allegations of inadequate informed consent.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2005 Aug; 20(8):8. PubMed ID: 16320461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Case study: agency says institutional review board (IRB) did not fulfill duties so agency investigation expands.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2006 Apr; 21(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 16832919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
