These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12814111)

  • 41. Reporting problems in human research and resultant investigations by IRBs.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2002 Aug; 17(8):6-7. PubMed ID: 12731495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Conflict + interest: financial incentives and informed consent in human subject research.
    Benbow S
    Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 2003; 17(1):181-215. PubMed ID: 14986653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. At your own risk. Some patients join clinical trials out of desperation, others to help medicine advance. Who is to blame if they get sick--or even die?
    Lemonick MD; Goldstein A
    Time; 2002 Apr; 159(16):46-56. PubMed ID: 11974609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Trials and tribulations: an expose of the HPV vaccine trials by the 72nd Parliamentary Standing Committee Report.
    Sarojini N; Deepa V
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2013; 10(4):220-2. PubMed ID: 24152343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Case study: university finally can resume human subjects research again.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 Aug; 21(8):6-7. PubMed ID: 17058815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. University uses "implied informed consent".
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2005 Mar; 20(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 15856566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Case study: agency says institutional review board (IRB) failed to warn subjects of significant problems.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 Mar; 21(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 16789303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Legal liability in clinical trials from the viewpoint of the clinician].
    Luft FC
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):646-8; discussion 649-52. PubMed ID: 8588439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Proxy consent and a national DNA databank: an unethical and discriminatory combination.
    Baumann TK
    Iowa Law Rev; 2001 Jan; 86(2):667-701. PubMed ID: 16184651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Conflicts of interest in medical research: how much conflict should exceed legal boundaries?
    Klanica K
    J Biolaw Bus; 2005; 8(3):37-45. PubMed ID: 16459426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Research: history repeats itself.
    Srinivasan S; Pai SA
    Issues Med Ethics; 2001; 9(4):108. PubMed ID: 16334911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A review of OHRP compliance oversight letters.
    Borror K; Carome M; McNeilly P; Weil C
    IRB; 2003; 25(5):1-4. PubMed ID: 14870724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Legal and ethical issues associated with patient recruitment in clinical trials: the case of competitive enrolment.
    Caulfield T
    Health Law Rev; 2005; 13(2-3):58-61. PubMed ID: 16459415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Legal liability in drug trials].
    Frölich JC
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):641-6. PubMed ID: 8588438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Ethical oversight of research in developing countries.
    Kass N; Dawson L; Loyo-Berrios NI
    IRB; 2003; 25(2):1-10. PubMed ID: 12833901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Independent ethics committees for clinical research in Argentina. An evaluation and a system to guarantee their independence].
    Gonorazky SE
    Medicina (B Aires); 2008; 68(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 18499958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Ten questions institutional review boards should ask when reviewing international clinical research protocols.
    Fitzgerald DW; Wasunna A; Pape JW
    IRB; 2003; 25(2):14-8. PubMed ID: 12833903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Violation of compliance rules led to university terminations.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2000 Sep; 15(9):3. PubMed ID: 11917937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Part I: what is the requirement for data sharing?
    de Wolf VA; Sieber JE; Steel PM; Zarate AO
    IRB; 2005; 27(6):12-6. PubMed ID: 16425480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Case study: research subject says institutional review board (IRB) was no help.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 Jan; 21(1):7. PubMed ID: 16789306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.