These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12814113)

  • 1. Embryos and research with human subjects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2003 Feb; 18(2):4. PubMed ID: 12814113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bush appoints new advisory committee on human subjects.
    Brainard J
    Chron High Educ; 2003 Jan; 49(19):A22. PubMed ID: 15287116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In focus. The brief career of a government advisory committee: one members's perspective. The life and death of the National Human Research Protections Advisory Committee (NHRPAC).
    Moreno JD
    Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(4):W23. PubMed ID: 12778944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Institutional review boards and the privacy of human research subjects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2002 Aug; 17(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 12731492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.
    Gandhi R
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(2):264-330. PubMed ID: 16471026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regulations, ethics, and research with children.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2004 Apr; 19(4):3. PubMed ID: 15462033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New recommendations for protecting children as human research subjects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2004 Nov; 19(11):1-2. PubMed ID: 15675086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New oversight agency proposed for human research subjects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2000 Mar; 15(3):9. PubMed ID: 12199225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New human subject protection regulations are being delayed.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jan; 20(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 15810181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. University later admits that regulations were not followed.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2002 Feb; 17(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 12374176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. University failed to have adequate IRB policies and procedures in place.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2002 Mar; 17(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 12408153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Protecting vulnerable research subjects: practical realities of institutional review board review and approval.
    Wichman A
    J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):88-104. PubMed ID: 15573431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. President's Commission seeks information on reported violations of subject protection.
    IRB; 1980 Nov; 2(9):9. PubMed ID: 11661887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Embryonic stem cell research: one small step for science or one giant leap back for mankind?
    Erwin CG
    Univ Ill Law Rev; 2003; 2003(1):211-43. PubMed ID: 15568234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. University denies that it failed to comply with special rule for subjects who are prisoners.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2002 Jan; 17(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 16270439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. NBAC recommendations on oversight of human subject research.
    Lo B; Groman M
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2003; 32(3):493-512. PubMed ID: 12715803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Institutional review boards (IRBs) failed to use steps to protect vulnerable research subjects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jun; 18(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 15119342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. HHS draft guidance on financial conflicts of interest.
    Barnes M; Gallin K
    IRB; 2003; 25(5):15-6. PubMed ID: 14870740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In harm's way: research subjects who are decisionally impaired.
    Sundram CJ
    J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):36-65. PubMed ID: 15573429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Institutional review boards, research on children, and informed consent of parents: walking the tightrope between encouraging vital experimentation and protecting subjects' rights.
    Katerberg RJ
    J Coll Univ Law; 1998; 24(3):545-79. PubMed ID: 16331880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.