These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

475 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12814232)

  • 1. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem of electroencephalography.
    Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 12814232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forward and inverse problems of EEG dipole localization.
    Musha T; Okamoto Y
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1999; 27(3-5):189-239. PubMed ID: 10864280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem for N(20)-P (20) somatosensory evoked potentials.
    Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J; Savard P
    Brain Topogr; 2013 Jan; 26(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 22723019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dipole models for the EEG and MEG.
    Schimpf PH; Ramon C; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 12002172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of the isolated problem approach for multi-compartment BEM models of electro-magnetic source imaging.
    Gençer NG; Akalin-Acar Z
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3007-22. PubMed ID: 15972977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical performance analysis of signal variance-based dipole models for MEG/EEG source localization and detection.
    Rodríguez-Rivera A; Van Veen BD; Wakai RT
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Feb; 50(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 12665027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reduced conductivity dependence method for increase of dipole localization accuracy in the EEG inverse problem.
    Yitembe BR; Crevecoeur G; Van Keer R; Dupre L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 May; 58(5):1430-40. PubMed ID: 21257364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dipole estimation errors due to not incorporating anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Staelens S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6079-93. PubMed ID: 19779215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; Delputte S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1877-94. PubMed ID: 18364544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of anisotropic conductivity on EEG source reconstruction: investigations in a rabbit model.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Eiselt M; Giessler F; Flemming L; Anwander A; Knösche TR; Wolters CH; Dümpelmann M; Tuch DS; Reichenbach JR
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1841-50. PubMed ID: 16941840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating brain conductivities and dipole source signals with EEG arrays.
    Gutiérrez D; Nehorai A; Muravchik CH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2113-22. PubMed ID: 15605858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parametric surface-source modeling and estimation with electroencephalography.
    Cao N; Yetik IS; Nehorai A; Muravchik CH; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Dec; 53(12 Pt 1):2414-24. PubMed ID: 17153198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ellipsoidal refinement of the regularized inverse: performance in an anatomically realistic EEG model.
    Schimpf PH; Haueisen J; Ramon C
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Apr; 51(4):679-83. PubMed ID: 15072223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A finite difference method with reciprocity used to incorporate anisotropy in electroencephalogram dipole source localization.
    Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; D'Asseler Y; Lemahieu I; Van de Walle R
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(16):3787-806. PubMed ID: 16077227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of head tissue conductivity in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models.
    Van Uitert R; Johnson C; Zhukov L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2129-37. PubMed ID: 15605860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Probabilistic forward model for electroencephalography source analysis.
    Plis SM; George JS; Jun SC; Ranken DM; Volegov PL; Schmidt DM
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(17):5309-27. PubMed ID: 17762088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models.
    Odabaee M; Tokariev A; Layeghy S; Mesbah M; Colditz PB; Ramon C; Vanhatalo S
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():73-80. PubMed ID: 24736169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Linear inverse solutions: simulations from a realistic head model in MEG.
    Soufflet L; Boeijinga PH
    Brain Topogr; 2005; 18(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 16341577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of head models on neuromagnetic fields and inverse source localizations.
    Ramon C; Haueisen J; Schimpf PH
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Oct; 5():55. PubMed ID: 17059601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.