121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12814243)
1. Assessment of myocardial lesion size during in vitro radio frequency catheter ablation.
He DS; Bosnos M; Mays MZ; Marcus F
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):768-76. PubMed ID: 12814243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Noncontact radio-frequency ablation for obtaining deeper lesions.
Zhang J; Tsai JZ; Cao H; Chen Y; Will JA; Vorperian VR; Webster JG
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Feb; 50(2):218-23. PubMed ID: 12665035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. FEM analysis of predicting electrode-myocardium contact from RF cardiac catheter ablation system impedance.
Cao H; Speidel MA; Tsai JZ; Van Lysel MS; Vorperian VR; Webster JG
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Jun; 49(6):520-6. PubMed ID: 12046696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Indication of the radiofrequency induced lesion size by pre-ablation measurements.
Stagegaard N; Petersen HH; Chen X; Svendsen JH
Europace; 2005 Nov; 7(6):525-34. PubMed ID: 16216752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ablation lesion size correlates with pacing threshold: a physiological basis for use of pacing to assess ablation lesions.
Sapp JL; Soejima K; Cooper JM; Epstein LM; Stevenson WG
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Jul; 27(7):933-7. PubMed ID: 15271012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Large radiofrequency ablation lesions can be created with a retractable infusion-needle catheter.
Sapp JL; Cooper JM; Zei P; Stevenson WG
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Jun; 17(6):657-61. PubMed ID: 16836718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impedance and temperature monitoring improve the safety of closed-loop irrigated-tip radiofrequency ablation.
Thiagalingam A; D'Avila A; McPherson C; Malchano Z; Ruskin J; Reddy VY
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2007 Mar; 18(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 17313656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Catheter ablation of ventricular epicardial tissue: a comparison of standard and cooled-tip radiofrequency energy.
d'Avila A; Houghtaling C; Gutierrez P; Vragovic O; Ruskin JN; Josephson ME; Reddy VY
Circulation; 2004 May; 109(19):2363-9. PubMed ID: 15096448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Myocardial electrical impedance as a predictor of the quality of RF-induced linear lesions.
Dumas Iii JH; Himel Iv HD; Kiser AC; Quint SR; Knisley SB
Physiol Meas; 2008 Oct; 29(10):1195-207. PubMed ID: 18799837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impedance measurement to assess epicardial fat prior to RF intraoperative cardiac ablation: a feasibility study using a computer model.
González-Suárez A; Hornero F; Berjano EJ
Physiol Meas; 2010 Nov; 31(11):N95-104. PubMed ID: 20952818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using electrical impedance to predict catheter-endocardial contact during RF cardiac ablation.
Cao H; Tungjitkusolmun S; Choy YB; Tsai JZ; Vorperian VR; Webster JG
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Mar; 49(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 11876289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gold-tip electrodes--a new "deep lesion" technology for catheter ablation? In vitro comparison of a gold alloy versus platinum-iridium tip electrode ablation catheter.
Lewalter T; Bitzen A; Wurtz S; Blum R; Schlodder K; Yang A; Lickfett L; Schwab JO; Schrickel JW; Tiemann K; Linhart M; Zima E; Merkely B; Lüderitz B
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2005 Jul; 16(7):770-2. PubMed ID: 16050836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Temperature measurement within myocardium during in vitro RF catheter ablation.
Cao H; Vorperian VR; Tsai JZ; Tungjitkusolmun S; Woo EJ; Webster JG
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Nov; 47(11):1518-24. PubMed ID: 11077746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of lesion sizes produced by cryoablation and open irrigation radiofrequency ablation catheters.
Parvez B; Pathak V; Schubert CM; Wood M
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2008 May; 19(5):528-34. PubMed ID: 18284508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Time to electrode rewarming after cryoablation predicts lesion size.
Parvez B; Goldberg SM; Pathak V; Schubert CM; Wood MA
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2007 Aug; 18(8):845-8. PubMed ID: 17553073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Guidelines for predicting lesion size at common endocardial locations during radio-frequency ablation.
Tungjitkusolmun S; Vorperian VR; Bhavaraju N; Cao H; Tsai JZ; Webster JG
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Feb; 48(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 11296875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. RF catheter ablation: Lessons on lesions.
Wittkampf FH; Nakagawa H
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Nov; 29(11):1285-97. PubMed ID: 17100685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient factors affecting thermal lesion size with an impedance-based radiofrequency ablation system.
Glaiberman CB; Pilgram TK; Brown DB
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2005 Oct; 16(10):1341-8. PubMed ID: 16221905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanisms for enlarging lesion size during irrigated tip radiofrequency ablation: is there a virtual electrode effect?
Petersen HH; Roman-Gonzalez J; Johnson SB; Hastrup Svendsen J; HaunsØ S; Packer DL
J Interv Cardiol; 2004 Jun; 17(3):171-7. PubMed ID: 15209580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [An experimental study on the alteration of myocardial tissue by radiofrequency catheter ablation: differences according to the frequency and the device].
Ikeda T; Sugi K; Ninomiya K; Enjoji Y; Nishiwaki H; Abe R; Yabuki S; Machii K; Takahashi K; Naoe S
Kokyu To Junkan; 1991 Aug; 39(8):807-11. PubMed ID: 1925102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
