These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12814301)

  • 1. Reactions to merit pay increases: a longitudinal test of a signal sensitivity perspective.
    Shaw JD; Duffy MK; Mitra A; Lockhart DE; Bowler M
    J Appl Psychol; 2003 Jun; 88(3):538-44. PubMed ID: 12814301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An under-met and over-met expectations model of employee reactions to merit raises.
    Schaubroeck J; Shaw JD; Duffy MK; Mitra A
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 Mar; 93(2):424-34. PubMed ID: 18361641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of pay level satisfaction.
    Williams ML; McDaniel MA; Nguyen NT
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 Mar; 91(2):392-413. PubMed ID: 16551191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why doesn't performance pay work?
    Griffin RP
    Health Manpow Manage; 1992; 18(4):31-3. PubMed ID: 10124180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Resolving the merit pay dilemma demands HR involvement in compensation philosophy.
    Browdy JD
    Healthc Hum Resour; 1993 Oct; 2(10):10-1. PubMed ID: 10135941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of negative affectivity in pay-at-risk reactions: a longitudinal study.
    Begley T; Lee C
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Mar; 90(2):382-8. PubMed ID: 15769246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Current methods, problems and future trends. The merit of merit pay.
    Printz RA; Waldman DA
    Pers Adm; 1985 Jan; 30(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 10269516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pay raises: merit or seniority?
    Umiker WO
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1983 Sep; 15(9):63-8. PubMed ID: 10262432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wrestling with pay equity? Design your own merit pay delivery system.
    Brinks JT
    Mod Healthc; 1981 Mar; 11(3):108, 110, 112. PubMed ID: 10250322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pay increase guidelines with merit.
    Doyel HW; Johnson JL
    Pers J; 1985 Jun; 64(6):46, 49-50. PubMed ID: 10271646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A simple and flexible model to calculate annual merit raises for health sciences faculty.
    Mehvar R
    Comput Biol Med; 2020 Jan; 116():103533. PubMed ID: 31733629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Merit pay: fact or fiction?
    Lawler EE
    Manage Rev; 1981 Apr; 70(4):50-3. PubMed ID: 10251505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Compensating the red-circle employee.
    Reed PR; Kroll MJ
    Health Prog; 1985 Oct; 66(8):39-41. PubMed ID: 10274197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Should pay in radiology be tied to productivity? The case in favor.
    Willing SJ; Phillips CD
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Jan; 11(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 14746404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Should pay in radiology be tied to productivity?
    Evens RG
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Mar; 11(3):359-60. PubMed ID: 15035526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why doesn't performance pay work?
    Health Manpow Manage; 1993; 19(2):11-3. PubMed ID: 10129180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human resources: Part 2 of 3. PM's pay is not the prime number.
    Smith P
    Health Serv J; 2010 May; 120(6206):24. PubMed ID: 20535885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variable pay plans raise the bar on performance.
    Strateg Healthc Excell; 2000 Jun; 13(6):9-12. PubMed ID: 11183057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. If the new pay system is fair, why are so many nurses on a downward slide?
    Waters A
    Nurs Stand; 2008 Jun 11-17; 22(40):12-4. PubMed ID: 18610925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Should pay in radiology be tied to productivity? The case against.
    Cohen MD; Gunderman RB; Alexander SG
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Aug; 9(8):964-70. PubMed ID: 12186447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.