BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12814312)

  • 1. Sinus augmentation bone grafts for the provision of dental implants: report of clinical outcome.
    McCarthy C; Patel RR; Wragg PF; Brook IM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):377-82. PubMed ID: 12814312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dental implants and onlay bone grafts in the anterior maxilla: analysis of clinical outcome.
    McCarthy C; Patel RR; Wragg PF; Brook IM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):238-41. PubMed ID: 12705302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture.
    Hallman M; Sennerby L; Lundgren S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):635-43. PubMed ID: 12381063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endosseous implants and bone augmentation in the partially dentate maxilla: an analysis of 17 patients with a follow-up of 29 to 101 months.
    Becktor JP; Isaksson S; Sennerby L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):603-8. PubMed ID: 17929521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of implant placement after bone grafting for three-dimensional reconstruction of the posterior jaw.
    Bahat O; Fontanessi RV
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2001 Jun; 21(3):220-31. PubMed ID: 11490399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sinus floor elevation using a bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss) with or without the concomitant use of a bilayered collagen barrier (Bio-Gide): a clinical report of immediate and delayed implant placement.
    Tawil G; Mawla M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):713-21. PubMed ID: 11669254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-stage maxillary sinus reconstruction with endosseous implants: a prospective study.
    Blomqvist JE; Alberius P; Isaksson S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):758-66. PubMed ID: 9857586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with dental implants in the augmented maxillary sinus: a 5-year clinical investigation.
    Hürzeler MB; Kirsch A; Ackermann KL; Quiñones CR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):466-75. PubMed ID: 8803342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implant placement immediately after the lateral approach of the trap door window procedure to create a maxillary sinus lift without bone grafting: a 2-year retrospective evaluation of 47 implants in 33 patients.
    Chen TW; Chang HS; Leung KW; Lai YL; Kao SY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Nov; 65(11):2324-8. PubMed ID: 17954333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of dental implants after staged sinus floor elevation procedures: 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients.
    Bornstein MM; Chappuis V; von Arx T; Buser D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1034-43. PubMed ID: 18828820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The correlation of bone mineral density and histologic data in the early grafted maxillary sinus: a preliminary report.
    Lee CY; Prasad HS; Suzuki JB; Stover JD; Rohrer MD
    Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):202-14. PubMed ID: 21613947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Porous titanium granules used as osteoconductive material for sinus floor augmentation: a clinical pilot study.
    Bystedt H; Rasmusson L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Jun; 11(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 18657154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implant reconstruction of the bone-grafted maxilla: review of the literature and presentation of 8 cases.
    Clayman L
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Apr; 64(4):674-82. PubMed ID: 16546648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sinus floor augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite mixed with fibrin glue and later placement of nonsubmerged implants: a retrospective study in 50 patients.
    Hallman M; Nordin T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 15101593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading.
    Urban IA; Jovanovic SA; Lozada JL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):502-10. PubMed ID: 19587874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical and histologic comparison of two different composite grafts for sinus augmentation: a pilot clinical trial.
    Galindo-Moreno P; Avila G; Fernández-Barbero JE; Mesa F; O'Valle-Ravassa F; Wang HL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):755-9. PubMed ID: 18573123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Outcome of oral implants after autogenous bone reconstruction].
    Kamal D; Abida S; Jammet P; Goudot P; Yachouh J
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2009 Apr; 110(2):86-8. PubMed ID: 19327803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Massive sinus-lift procedures with beta-tricalcium phosphate: long-term results].
    Meyer C; Chatelain B; Benarroch M; Garnier JF; Ricbourg B; Camponovo T
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2009 Apr; 110(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 19171358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation: a clinical report.
    Toffler M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):266-73. PubMed ID: 15101599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sinus grafting with a natural fluorohydroxyapatite for immediate load: a study with histologic analysis and histomorphometry.
    Lee CY; Rohrer MD; Prasad HS; Stover JD; Suzuki JB
    J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(4):164-75. PubMed ID: 19813420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 67.