453 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12814316)
1. A comparison of hydroxyapatite (HA) -coated threaded, HA-coated cylindric, and titanium threaded endosseous dental implants.
Jeffcoat MK; McGlumphy EA; Reddy MS; Geurs NC; Proskin HM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):406-10. PubMed ID: 12814316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Marginal bone loss pattern around hydroxyapatite-coated versus commercially pure titanium implants after up to 12 years of follow-up.
Schwartz-Arad D; Mardinger O; Levin L; Kozlovsky A; Hirshberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 15839117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective study of 429 hydroxyapatite-coated cylindric omniloc implants placed in 121 patients.
McGlumphy EA; Peterson LJ; Larsen PE; Jeffcoat MK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 12608673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: a clinical report.
Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Haanaes HR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 10453670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A distinguishable observation between survival and success rate outcome of hydroxyapatite-coated implants in 5-10 years in function.
Artzi Z; Carmeli G; Kozlovsky A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 16441789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Periodontal-type measurements associated with hydroxyapatite-coated and non-HA-coated implants: uncovering to 36 months.
Morris HF; Ochi S; Spray JR; Olson JW
Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):56-67. PubMed ID: 11885182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of implant geometry and surface characteristics on progressive osseointegration.
Geurs NC; Jeffcoat RL; McGlumphy EA; Reddy MS; Jeffcoat MK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(6):811-5. PubMed ID: 12507240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: 1-year prospective study.
Kan JY; Rungcharassaeng K; Lozada J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 12608666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term evaluation of implant survival in augmented sinuses: a case series.
Yamamichi N; Itose T; Neiva R; Wang HL
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Apr; 28(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 18546812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of installation depth on survival of an hydroxyapatite-coated Bicon implant for single-tooth restoration.
Lee EH; Ryu SM; Kim JY; Cho BO; Lee YC; Park YJ; Kim SG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jun; 68(6):1345-52. PubMed ID: 20356664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of threaded hydroxyapatite-coated implants placed in the posterior mandible in support of fixed prostheses.
Buchs AU; Hahn J; Vassos DM
Implant Dent; 1996; 5(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 9081576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of bioactive glass coated and hydroxyapatite coated titanium dental implants in the human jaw bone.
Mistry S; Kundu D; Datta S; Basu D
Aust Dent J; 2011 Mar; 56(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 21332743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A 48-month multicentric clinical investigation: implant design and survival.
Morris HF; Winkler S; Ochi S
J Oral Implantol; 2001; 27(4):180-6. PubMed ID: 12500876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of hydroxyapatite-coated Micro-Vent and pure titanium Swede-Vent implants.
Evian CI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(5):639-44. PubMed ID: 8908863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A long-term retrospective study of two different implant surfaces placed after reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla using Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional bone grafting.
Marchetti C; Pieri F; Corinaldesi G; Degidi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):911-8. PubMed ID: 19014162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Survival of hydroxyapatite-coated implants: a meta-analytic review.
Lee JJ; Rouhfar L; Beirne OR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Dec; 58(12):1372-9; discussion 1379-80. PubMed ID: 11117685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Survival and success of sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched and titanium plasma-sprayed implants: a retrospective study.
Arlin ML
J Can Dent Assoc; 2007 Nov; 73(9):821. PubMed ID: 18028757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hot isostatic pressing-processed hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants: light microscopic and scanning electron microscopy investigations.
Wie H; Herø H; Solheim T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):837-44. PubMed ID: 9857595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Four-year follow-up of larger-diameter implants placed in fresh extraction sockets using a resorbable membrane or a resorbable alloplastic material.
Prosper L; Gherlone EF; Redaelli S; Quaranta M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):856-64. PubMed ID: 14696661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
