139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12814926)
1. Survey of posteroanterior chest radiography in The Netherlands: patient dose and image quality.
van Soldt RT; Zweers D; van den Berg L; Geleijns J; Jansen JT; Zoetelief J
Br J Radiol; 2003 Jun; 76(906):398-405. PubMed ID: 12814926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Local diagnostic reference levels for adult posteroanterior (PA) chest x-ray examination in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Teferi S; Admassie D; Worku A; Zewdeneh D
Ethiop Med J; 2010 Jan; 48(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 20607998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [CR (Computed Radiography)].
Matsumoto M
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 12766288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient doses and image quality in digital chest radiology.
Salát D; Nikodemová D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):147-9. PubMed ID: 18321878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital chest radiography system with amorphous selenium flat-panel detectors: Qualitative and dosimetric comparison with a dedicated film-screen system.
Prato A; Ropolo R; Fava C
Radiol Med; 2005; 110(5-6):561-73. PubMed ID: 16437042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital radiography in paediatrics: radiation dose considerations and magnitude of possible dose reduction.
Hufton AP; Doyle SM; Carty HM
Br J Radiol; 1998 Feb; 71(842):186-99. PubMed ID: 9579183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bulgarian experience in the establishment of reference dose levels and implementation of a quality control system in diagnostic radiology.
Vassileva J; Dimov A; Slavchev A; Karadjov A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):131-4. PubMed ID: 16464832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [A study of optimum radiographic conditions on chest examinations with computed radiology (CR) in conjunction with the offset balance of patient dose and image quality].
Muto H; Mori T; Hayakawa H
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 May; 61(6):303-9. PubMed ID: 11431936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An investigation into the radiation dose associated with different imaging systems for chest radiology.
Marshall NW; Faulkner K; Busch HP; Marsh DM; Pfenning H
Br J Radiol; 1994 Apr; 67(796):353-9. PubMed ID: 8173876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography.
Ganten M; Radeleff B; Kampschulte A; Daniels MD; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 12818852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [A study of entrance surface dose with CR and film/screen systems, and analysis of the X-ray conditions for chest radiography].
Mori T; Muto H
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2000 Dec; 60(14):863-7. PubMed ID: 11197837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital chest radiography image quality assessment with dose reduction.
Grewal RK; Young N; Colins L; Karunnaratne N; Sabharwal N
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2012 Mar; 35(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 22302464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography.
Fink C; Hallscheidt PJ; Noeldge G; Kampschulte A; Radeleff B; Hosch WP; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):481-6. PubMed ID: 11804922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient dose and image quality in five standard x-ray examinations.
Havukainen R; Pirinen M
Med Phys; 1993; 20(3):813-7. PubMed ID: 8350841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
Hamer OW; Sirlin CB; Strotzer M; Borisch I; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Völk M
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. AMBER and conventional chest radiography: comparison of radiation dose and image quality.
Geleijns J; Broerse JJ; Julius HW; Vrooman HA; Zoetelief J; Zweers D; Kool LJ
Radiology; 1992 Dec; 185(3):719-23. PubMed ID: 1438752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dose reduction in digital chest radiography and perceived image quality.
Kroft LJ; Veldkamp WJ; Mertens BJ; van Delft JP; Geleijns J
Br J Radiol; 2007 Dec; 80(960):984-8. PubMed ID: 17940130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dose-image quality optimisation in digital chest radiography.
Doyle P; Martin CJ; Gentle D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):269-72. PubMed ID: 15933120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Image quality and radiation dose on digital chest imaging: comparison of amorphous silicon and amorphous selenium flat-panel systems.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Vereecken L; De Hauwere A; Duyck P; De Man R; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Sep; 187(3):630-7. PubMed ID: 16928923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
