These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12814926)

  • 21. Radiation dose levels for conventional chest and abdominal X-ray procedures in elected hospitals in Sudan.
    Babikir E; Hasan HA; Abdelrazig A; Alkhorayef MA; Manssor E; Sulieman A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):102-6. PubMed ID: 25852182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Optimization of radiographic technique for chest radiography.
    Warren-Forward HM; Millar JS
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Nov; 68(815):1221-9. PubMed ID: 8542230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Report of an image quality and dose audit according to directive 97/43/Euratom at Spanish private radiodiagnostics facilities.
    González L; Vañó E; Oliete S; Manrique J; Hernáez JM; Lahuerta J; Ruiz J
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Feb; 72(854):186-92. PubMed ID: 10365071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology. Image quality and radiation dose considerations.
    Axelsson B; Forsberg H; Hansson B; Haverling M
    Acta Radiol; 1991 Jan; 32(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 2012722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Chest radiography with a digital flat-panel detector: experimental receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Metz S; Damoser P; Hollweck R; Roggel R; Engelke C; Woertler K; Renger B; Rummeny EJ; Link TM
    Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 15734933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does digital imaging decrease patient dose? A pilot study and review of the literature.
    Neofotistou V; Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Schreiner-Karoussou A; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):204-10. PubMed ID: 16464833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Patient doses in radiographic examinations in 12 countries in Asia, Africa, and Eastern Europe: initial results from IAEA projects.
    Muhogora WE; Ahmed NA; Almosabihi A; Alsuwaidi JS; Beganovic A; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Kabuya FK; Krisanachinda A; Milakovic M; Mukwada G; Ramanandraibe MJ; Rehani MM; Rouzitalab J; Shandorf C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):1453-61. PubMed ID: 18492891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Patient dose measurement in common medical X-ray examinations in Iran.
    Rasuli B; Mahmoud-Pashazadeh A; Ghorbani M; Juybari RT; Naserpour M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 17(1):374-386. PubMed ID: 26894357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Patient dose measurements in diagnostic radiology procedures in Montenegro.
    Milatović A; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Ivanović S; Jovanović S; Spasić-Jokić V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 May; 149(4):454-63. PubMed ID: 21775317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Chest image quality: film-screen vs. computed radiography.
    Freedman M
    Adm Radiol; 1991 Jul; 10(7):38-40, 42. PubMed ID: 10170769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems.
    Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
    Tingberg A; Sjöström D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dose optimisation in computed radiography.
    Schreiner-Karoussou A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):139-42. PubMed ID: 16461522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Entrance surface doses to patients undergoing selected diagnostic X-ray examinations in Sudan.
    Suliman II; Abbas N; Habbani FI
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 16973669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Nationwide surveys of chest, abdomen, lumbosacral spine radiography, and upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy: a summary of findings.
    Spelic DC; Kaczmarek RV; Hilohi MC; Moyal AE
    Health Phys; 2010 Mar; 98(3):498-514. PubMed ID: 20147791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and effective dose using four digital systems.
    Pascoal A; Lawinski CP; Mackenzie A; Tabakov S; Lewis CA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):273-7. PubMed ID: 15933121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparative assessment of entrance surface doses in analogue and digital radiography during common radiographic examinations.
    Seo D; Jang S; Kim J; Kim J; Sung D; Kim H; Yoon Y
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Jan; 158(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 23887271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Application of European Commission reference dose levels in CT examinations in Crete, Greece.
    Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Papadimitriou D
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Sep; 74(885):836-40. PubMed ID: 11560832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography at different exposure doses versus mammography film: possibility of radiation dose reduction in detecting rheumatologic bone defects.
    Zähringer M; Reineck S; Perniok A; Krüger K; Andermahr J; Rubbert A; Winnekendonk G
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Mar; 49(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 18300139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Routine chest radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality at standard detector dose and 33% dose reduction.
    Strotzer M; Völk M; Fründ R; Hamer O; Zorger N; Feuerbach S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):169-71. PubMed ID: 11756114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.