These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. Does digital imaging decrease patient dose? A pilot study and review of the literature. Neofotistou V; Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Schreiner-Karoussou A; Vano E Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):204-10. PubMed ID: 16464833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Patient doses in radiographic examinations in 12 countries in Asia, Africa, and Eastern Europe: initial results from IAEA projects. Muhogora WE; Ahmed NA; Almosabihi A; Alsuwaidi JS; Beganovic A; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Kabuya FK; Krisanachinda A; Milakovic M; Mukwada G; Ramanandraibe MJ; Rehani MM; Rouzitalab J; Shandorf C AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):1453-61. PubMed ID: 18492891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Patient dose measurement in common medical X-ray examinations in Iran. Rasuli B; Mahmoud-Pashazadeh A; Ghorbani M; Juybari RT; Naserpour M J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 17(1):374-386. PubMed ID: 26894357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems. Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage. Tingberg A; Sjöström D Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dose optimisation in computed radiography. Schreiner-Karoussou A Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):139-42. PubMed ID: 16461522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Entrance surface doses to patients undergoing selected diagnostic X-ray examinations in Sudan. Suliman II; Abbas N; Habbani FI Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 16973669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Nationwide surveys of chest, abdomen, lumbosacral spine radiography, and upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy: a summary of findings. Spelic DC; Kaczmarek RV; Hilohi MC; Moyal AE Health Phys; 2010 Mar; 98(3):498-514. PubMed ID: 20147791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and effective dose using four digital systems. Pascoal A; Lawinski CP; Mackenzie A; Tabakov S; Lewis CA Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):273-7. PubMed ID: 15933121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparative assessment of entrance surface doses in analogue and digital radiography during common radiographic examinations. Seo D; Jang S; Kim J; Kim J; Sung D; Kim H; Yoon Y Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Jan; 158(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 23887271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Application of European Commission reference dose levels in CT examinations in Crete, Greece. Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Papadimitriou D Br J Radiol; 2001 Sep; 74(885):836-40. PubMed ID: 11560832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography at different exposure doses versus mammography film: possibility of radiation dose reduction in detecting rheumatologic bone defects. Zähringer M; Reineck S; Perniok A; Krüger K; Andermahr J; Rubbert A; Winnekendonk G Acta Radiol; 2008 Mar; 49(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 18300139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Routine chest radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality at standard detector dose and 33% dose reduction. Strotzer M; Völk M; Fründ R; Hamer O; Zorger N; Feuerbach S AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):169-71. PubMed ID: 11756114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]