These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12815457)

  • 1. Refinements to the partitioning of the inbred genotypic variance.
    Gordon IL
    Heredity (Edinb); 2003 Jul; 91(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 12815457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of genetic drift on the variance/covariance components generated by multilocus additive x additive epistatic systems.
    López-Fanjul C; Fernández A; Toro MA
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Mar; 239(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 16242726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficiency of selection, as measured by single nucleotide polymorphism variation, is dependent on inbreeding rate in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Demontis D; Pertoldi C; Loeschcke V; Mikkelsen K; Axelsson T; Kristensen TN
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Nov; 18(22):4551-63. PubMed ID: 19780974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A test of quantitative genetic theory using Drosophila- effects of inbreeding and rate of inbreeding on heritabilities and variance components.
    Kristensen TN; Sørensen AC; Sorensen D; Pedersen KS; Sørensen JG; Loeschcke V
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Jul; 18(4):763-70. PubMed ID: 16033547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two-locus drift with sex chromosomes: the partitioning and conversion of variance in subdivided populations.
    Whitlock MC
    Theor Popul Biol; 1995 Aug; 48(1):44-64. PubMed ID: 7660328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative genetics of autogamous F2.
    Gordon IL
    Hereditas; 2001; 134(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 11833289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Epistasis and the conversion of non-additive to additive genetic variance at population bottlenecks.
    López-Fanjul C; Fernández A; Toro MA
    Theor Popul Biol; 2000 Aug; 58(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 10944475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genotypic selection in Daphnia populations consisting of inbred sibships.
    Haag CR; Ebert D
    J Evol Biol; 2007 May; 20(3):881-91. PubMed ID: 17465899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting response to selection on a quantitative trait: a comparison between models for mixed-mating populations.
    Kelly JK; Williamson S
    J Theor Biol; 2000 Nov; 207(1):37-56. PubMed ID: 11027478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is inbreeding depression lower in maladapted populations? A quantitative genetics model.
    Ronce O; Shaw FH; Rousset F; Shaw RG
    Evolution; 2009 Jul; 63(7):1807-19. PubMed ID: 19473406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The change in quantitative genetic variation with inbreeding.
    Van Buskirk J; Willi Y
    Evolution; 2006 Dec; 60(12):2428-34. PubMed ID: 17263106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simultaneous estimation of null alleles and inbreeding coefficients.
    Chybicki IJ; Burczyk J
    J Hered; 2009; 100(1):106-13. PubMed ID: 18936113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of non-additive genetic interactions on selection in multi-locus genetic models.
    Hallander J; Waldmann P
    Heredity (Edinb); 2007 Jun; 98(6):349-59. PubMed ID: 17327874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of the mating system on the maintenance of genetic variability in polygenic characters.
    Lande R
    Genetics; 1977 Jun; 86(2 Pt. 1):485-98. PubMed ID: 407132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When it comes to inbreeding: slower is better.
    Reed DH
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Nov; 18(22):4521-2. PubMed ID: 20078763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic consequences of natal dispersal in the colonial lesser kestrel.
    Ortego J; Calabuig G; Aparicio JM; Cordero PJ
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Apr; 17(8):2051-9. PubMed ID: 18346124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mutation-selection balance accounting for genetic variation for viability in Drosophila melanogaster as deduced from an inbreeding and artificial selection experiment.
    Rodríguez-Ramilo ST; Pérez-Figueroa A; Fernández B; Fernández J; Caballero A
    J Evol Biol; 2004 May; 17(3):528-41. PubMed ID: 15149396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative genetics of allogamous F2: an origin of randomly fertilized populations.
    Gordon IL
    Heredity (Edinb); 2000 Jul; 85 ( Pt 1)():43-52. PubMed ID: 10971690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dominance models with method R for stature of Holsteins.
    Misztal I; Lawlor TJ; Fernando RL
    J Dairy Sci; 1997 May; 80(5):975-8. PubMed ID: 9178138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stochastic modeling of multiple ovulation and embryo transfer breeding schemes in small closed dairy cattle populations.
    Jeon GJ; Mao IL; Jensen J; Ferris TA
    J Dairy Sci; 1990 Jul; 73(7):1938-44. PubMed ID: 2229596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.