BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12815677)

  • 1. MRI detection of weak magnetic fields due to an extended current dipole in a conducting sphere: a model for direct detection of neuronal currents in the brain.
    Konn D; Gowland P; Bowtell R
    Magn Reson Med; 2003 Jul; 50(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 12815677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Realistic simulations of neuronal activity: a contribution to the debate on direct detection of neuronal currents by MRI.
    Cassarà AM; Hagberg GE; Bianciardi M; Migliore M; Maraviglia B
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):87-106. PubMed ID: 17936018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The magnetic field inside special conducting geometries due to internal current.
    Heller L; Ranken D; Best E
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Aug; 51(8):1310-8. PubMed ID: 15311815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulus-induced Rotary Saturation (SIRS): a potential method for the detection of neuronal currents with MRI.
    Witzel T; Lin FH; Rosen BR; Wald LL
    Neuroimage; 2008 Oct; 42(4):1357-65. PubMed ID: 18684643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling direct effects of neural current on MRI.
    Heller L; Barrowes BE; George JS
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Jan; 30(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 17990303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnetostatic image current and its application to an analytic identification of a current dipole inside a conducting sphere.
    He S; Norgren M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Feb; 47(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 10721625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Representation of bioelectric current sources using Whitney elements in the finite element method.
    Tanzer IO; Järvenpää S; Nenonen J; Somersalo E
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3023-39. PubMed ID: 15972978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Further steps toward direct magnetic resonance (MR) imaging detection of neural action currents: optimization of MR sensitivity to transient and weak currents in a conductor.
    Pell GS; Abbott DF; Fleming SW; Prichard JW; Jackson GD
    Magn Reson Med; 2006 May; 55(5):1038-46. PubMed ID: 16602069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modelling the magnetic signature of neuronal tissue.
    Blagoev KB; Mihaila B; Travis BJ; Alexandrov LB; Bishop AR; Ranken D; Posse S; Gasparovic C; Mayer A; Aine CJ; Ulbert I; Morita M; Müller W; Connor J; Halgren E
    Neuroimage; 2007 Aug; 37(1):137-48. PubMed ID: 17544300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detecting neuronal currents with MRI: a human study.
    Huang J
    Magn Reson Med; 2014 Feb; 71(2):756-62. PubMed ID: 23475847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The electric field induced in the brain by magnetic stimulation: a 3-D finite-element analysis of the effect of tissue heterogeneity and anisotropy.
    Miranda PC; Hallett M; Basser PJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Sep; 50(9):1074-85. PubMed ID: 12943275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical performance analysis of signal variance-based dipole models for MEG/EEG source localization and detection.
    Rodríguez-Rivera A; Van Veen BD; Wakai RT
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Feb; 50(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 12665027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neuronal current detection with low-field magnetic resonance: simulations and methods.
    Cassará AM; Maraviglia B; Hartwig S; Trahms L; Burghoff M
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Oct; 27(8):1131-9. PubMed ID: 19269766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of head models on neuromagnetic fields and inverse source localizations.
    Ramon C; Haueisen J; Schimpf PH
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Oct; 5():55. PubMed ID: 17059601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetic field perturbation of neural recording and stimulating microelectrodes.
    Martinez-Santiesteban FM; Swanson SD; Noll DC; Anderson DJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2073-88. PubMed ID: 17404456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem of electroencephalography.
    Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 12814232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Source reconstruction of brain electromagnetic fields--source iteration of minimum norm (SIMN).
    Liang WK; Wang MS
    Neuroimage; 2009 Oct; 47(4):1301-11. PubMed ID: 19361564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct MRI detection of neuronal magnetic fields in the brain: theoretical modeling.
    Xue Y; Gao JH; Xiong J
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jun; 31(2):550-9. PubMed ID: 16504542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MRI signal phase oscillates with neuronal activity in cerebral cortex: implications for neuronal current imaging.
    Du J; Vegh V; Reutens DC
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jul; 94():1-11. PubMed ID: 24642284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dipole models for the EEG and MEG.
    Schimpf PH; Ramon C; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 12002172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.