BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12815917)

  • 1. Comparative genomic hybridization-assisted prenatal diagnosis of a de novo inverted duplication of chromosome 10q. A case report.
    Chen CK; Chang SD; Chen YJ; Hsueh DW; Soong YK
    J Reprod Med; 2003 May; 48(5):391-4. PubMed ID: 12815917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inv dup del(10q): identification by fluorescence in situ hybridization and array comparative genomic hybridization in a fetus with two concurrent chromosomal rearrangements.
    Chen CP; Chen M; Su YN; Huang JP; Ma GC; Chang SP; Chern SR; Chen YT; Su JW; Lee CC; Town DD; Wang W
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 51(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 22795102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic analysis of partial monosomy 10q (10q25.3-->qter) and partial trisomy 18q (18q23-->qter) in a fetus associated with cystic hygroma and ambiguous genitalia.
    Chen CP; Chern SR; Wang TH; Hsueh DW; Lee CC; Town DD; Wang W; Ko TM
    Prenat Diagn; 2005 Jun; 25(6):492-6. PubMed ID: 15966044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chromosome analysis of uncultured amniocytes by comparative genomic hybridization in early amniocentesis.
    Ketupanya A; Aranyakasemsuk N; Tocharoentanaphol C; Vuthiwong C
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Nov; 88 Suppl 3():S1-6. PubMed ID: 16862671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of comparative genomic hybridization with conventional karyotype and classical fluorescence in situ hybridization for prenatal and postnatal diagnosis of unbalanced chromosome abnormalities.
    Lapierre JM; Cacheux V; Collot N; Da Silva F; Hervy N; Rivet D; Romana S; Wiss J; Benzaken B; Aurias A; Tachdjian G
    Ann Genet; 1998; 41(3):133-40. PubMed ID: 9833066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of rec(10)dup(10p)inv(10)(p11.2q26.3) in a fetus associated with paternal pericentric inversion.
    Chen CP; Ko TM; Su YN; Wang LK; Chern SR; Wu PS; Chen YN; Chen SW; Ko K; Lee CC; Chen LF; Yang CW; Wang W
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 55(5):733-737. PubMed ID: 27751426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prenatal detection of 46,XY,rec(5),dup q, inv(5)(p13q33) using DNA analysis, flow cytometry, and in situ hybridization to supplement classical cytogenetic analysis.
    Martin AO; Northrup H; Ledbetter DH; Trask B; van den Engh G; Le Beau MM; Beaudet AL; Gray JW; Sekhon G; Krassikoff N
    Am J Med Genet; 1988 Nov; 31(3):643-54. PubMed ID: 3228143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prenatal diagnosis of de novo t(2;18;14)(q33.1;q12.2;q31.2), dup(5)(q34q34), del(7)(p21.1p21.1), and del(10)(q25.3q25.3) and a review of the prenatally ascertained de novo apparently balanced complex and multiple chromosomal rearrangements.
    Chen CP; Chern SR; Lee CC; Lin CC; Li YC; Hsieh LJ; Chen WL; Wang W
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Feb; 26(2):138-46. PubMed ID: 16470734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inv dup del(9p): prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization by fluorescence in situ hybridization and array comparative genomic hybridization.
    Chen CP; Su YN; Chern SR; Hsu CY; Tsai FJ; Wu PC; Lee CC; Chen YT; Lee MS; Wang W
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 50(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 21482378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prenatal detection of a de novo terminal inverted duplication 4p in a fetus with the Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome phenotype.
    Beaujard MP; Jouannic JM; Bessières B; Borie C; Martin-Luis I; Fallet-Bianco C; Portnoï MF
    Prenat Diagn; 2005 Jun; 25(6):451-5. PubMed ID: 15966060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. De novo monosomy 9p24.3-pter and trisomy 17q24.3-qter characterised by microarray comparative genomic hybridisation in a fetus with an increased nuchal translucency.
    Brisset S; Kasakyan S; L'Herminé AC; Mairovitz V; Gautier E; Aubry MC; Benkhalifa M; Tachdjian G
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Mar; 26(3):206-13. PubMed ID: 16450348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A de novo complex chromosome rearrangement involving chromosomes 2, 3, 5, 9 and 11 detected prenatally and studied postnatally by conventional cytogenetics and molecular cytogenetic analyses.
    Mechoso B; Vaglio A; Quadrelli A; Mark HF; Huang XL; Milunsky A; Quadrelli R
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2007; 22(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 17369689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prenatal detection and characterization of a small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) derived from chromosome 22 with apparently normal phenotype.
    Lin CC; Hsieh YY; Wang CH; Li YC; Hsieh LJ; Lee CC; Tsai CH; Tsai FJ
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Oct; 26(10):898-902. PubMed ID: 16915592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. De novo 16p13.11 microdeletion identified by high-resolution array CGH in a fetus with increased nuchal translucency.
    Law LW; Lau TK; Fung TY; Leung TY; Wang CC; Choy KW
    BJOG; 2009 Jan; 116(2):339-43. PubMed ID: 19018765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Two different genetic analyses of spontaneously aborted specimen].
    Hu YL; Chen X; Chen LL; Zhu RF; Xu ZF; Wang ZQ; Zhu XH; Liu X
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 41(3):148-51. PubMed ID: 16640875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cytogenetical diagnosis in paraffin-embedded fetoplacental tissue using comparative genomic hybridization.
    Ozcan T; Burki N; Parkash V; Huang X; Pejovic T; Mahoney MJ; Ward DC
    Prenat Diagn; 2000 Jan; 20(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 10701850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prenatal diagnosis of a de novo supernumerary marker chromosome originating from chromosome 16.
    Yakut S; Cetin Z; Simşek M; Karaüzüm SB; Tükün A; Lüleci G
    Genet Couns; 2009; 20(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 20162867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prenatal diagnosis of a 9q34.3 microdeletion by array-CGH in a fetus with an apparently balanced translocation.
    Simovich MJ; Yatsenko SA; Kang SH; Cheung SW; Dudek ME; Pursley A; Ward PA; Patel A; Lupski JR
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Dec; 27(12):1112-7. PubMed ID: 17849500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis: another experience.
    Vialard F; Molina Gomes D; Leroy B; Quarello E; Escalona A; Le Sciellour C; Serazin V; Roume J; Ville Y; de Mazancourt P; Selva J
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2009; 25(2):277-84. PubMed ID: 19521095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The application and significance in prenatal diagnosis using G-banding, fluorescence in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization].
    Zhang WS; Chen QN; Wu XH; Liang QH
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 26(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 19350506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.