302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12816304)
1. Root coverage in molar recession: report of 50 consecutive cases treated with subepithelial connective tissue grafts.
Harris RJ
J Periodontol; 2003 May; 74(5):703-8. PubMed ID: 12816304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A short-term and long-term comparison of root coverage with an acellular dermal matrix and a subepithelial graft.
Harris RJ
J Periodontol; 2004 May; 75(5):734-43. PubMed ID: 15212356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of 2 clinical techniques for treatment of gingival recession.
Wang HL; Bunyaratavej P; Labadie M; Shyr Y; MacNeil RL
J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1301-11. PubMed ID: 11699470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Harvesting technique using a mucotome and modified surgical procedure for root coverage with enamel matrix derivatives with and without a connective tissue graft.
Gunay H; Dogan S; Geurtsen W
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Oct; 28(5):497-507. PubMed ID: 18991001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Significance of the epithelial collar on the subepithelial connective tissue graft.
Byun HY; Oh TJ; Abuhussein HM; Yamashita J; Soehren SE; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2009 Jun; 80(6):924-32. PubMed ID: 19485822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment of adjacent gingival recessions with subepithelial connective tissue grafts and the modified tunnel technique.
Tözüm TF; Dini FM
Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 12674352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changes in gingival dimensions following connective tissue grafts for root coverage: comparison of two procedures.
Han JS; John V; Blanchard SB; Kowolik MJ; Eckert GJ
J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1346-54. PubMed ID: 18672983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative 6-month clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recession.
Novaes AB; Grisi DC; Molina GO; Souza SL; Taba M; Grisi MF
J Periodontol; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1477-84. PubMed ID: 11759858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment of gingival recession: comparison of two techniques of subepithelial connective tissue graft.
Tözüm TF; Keçeli HG; Güncü GN; Hatipoğlu H; Sengün D
J Periodontol; 2005 Nov; 76(11):1842-8. PubMed ID: 16274302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recessions: six- to 12-month changes.
de Souza SL; Novaes AB; Grisi DC; Taba M; Grisi MF; de Andrade PF
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2008 Jul; 10(3):87-94. PubMed ID: 18714934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment of gingival recessions by combined periodontal regenerative technique, guided tissue regeneration, and subpedicle connective tissue graft. A comparative clinical study.
Paolantonio M
J Periodontol; 2002 Jan; 73(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 11846201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Root coverage and pocket reduction as combined surgical procedures.
Hirsch A; Attal U; Chai E; Goultschin J; Boyan BD; Schwartz Z
J Periodontol; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1572-9. PubMed ID: 11759869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Root coverage stability of the subepithelial connective tissue graft and guided tissue regeneration: a 30-month follow-up clinical trial.
Rosetti EP; Marcantonio E; Zuza EP; Marcantonio RA
J Dent; 2013 Feb; 41(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 22652007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Root coverage using the coronally positioned flap with or without a subepithelial connective tissue graft.
da Silva RC; Joly JC; de Lima AF; Tatakis DN
J Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 75(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 15088880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A preliminary comparative study of the guided tissue regeneration and free gingival graft procedures for adjacent facial root coverage.
Ito K; Oshio K; Shiomi N; Murai S
Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):319-26. PubMed ID: 11203942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative 6-month clinical study of a semilunar coronally positioned flap and subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession.
Bittencourt S; Del Peloso Ribeiro E; Sallum EA; Sallum AW; Nociti FH; Casati MZ
J Periodontol; 2006 Feb; 77(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 16460241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative clinical study of a bioabsorbable membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of human gingival recession.
Borghetti A; Glise JM; Monnet-Corti V; Dejou J
J Periodontol; 1999 Feb; 70(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10102549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Xenogeneic collagen matrix with coronally advanced flap compared to connective tissue with coronally advanced flap for the treatment of dehiscence-type recession defects.
McGuire MK; Scheyer ET
J Periodontol; 2010 Aug; 81(8):1108-17. PubMed ID: 20350159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgical microscope may enhance root coverage with subepithelial connective tissue graft: a randomized-controlled clinical trial.
Bittencourt S; Del Peloso Ribeiro E; Sallum EA; Nociti FH; Casati MZ
J Periodontol; 2012 Jun; 83(6):721-30. PubMed ID: 21870975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Subepithelial connective tissue graft for treatment of gingival recessions with and without enamel matrix derivative: a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial.
Rasperini G; Roccuzzo M; Francetti L; Acunzo R; Consonni D; Silvestri M
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2011 Apr; 31(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 21491012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
