229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12817425)
1. Agreement and error rates using blinded review to evaluate surgical pathology of biopsy material.
Renshaw AA; Cartagena N; Granter SR; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Jun; 119(6):797-800. PubMed ID: 12817425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation of workload with disagreement and amendment rates in surgical pathology and nongynecologic cytology.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Jun; 125(6):820-2. PubMed ID: 16690479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measuring the value of review of pathology material by a second pathologist.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 May; 125(5):737-9. PubMed ID: 16707375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Amended reports in surgical pathology and implications for diagnostic error detection and avoidance: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes study of 1,667,547 accessioned cases in 359 laboratories.
Nakhleh RE; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Apr; 122(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 9648896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of disagreement and amendment rates by tissue type and diagnosis: identifying cases for directed blinded review.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Nov; 126(5):736-9. PubMed ID: 17050070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Blinded review as a method for quality improvement in surgical pathology.
Renshaw AA; Pinnar NE; Jiroutek MR; Young ML
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2002 Aug; 126(8):961-3. PubMed ID: 12171496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mandatory second opinion in surgical pathology referral material: clinical consequences of major disagreements.
Manion E; Cohen MB; Weydert J
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 May; 32(5):732-7. PubMed ID: 18360282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measuring errors in surgical pathology in real-life practice: defining what does and does not matter.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jan; 127(1):144-52. PubMed ID: 17145620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring and reporting errors in surgical pathology. Lessons from gynecologic cytology.
Renshaw AA
Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Mar; 115(3):338-41. PubMed ID: 11242788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of disagreement and error rates for three types of interdepartmental consultations.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Dec; 124(6):878-82. PubMed ID: 16416737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical impact and frequency of anatomic pathology errors in cancer diagnoses.
Raab SS; Grzybicki DM; Janosky JE; Zarbo RJ; Meier FA; Jensen C; Geyer SJ
Cancer; 2005 Nov; 104(10):2205-13. PubMed ID: 16216029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recent trends in quality, patient safety, and error reduction in nongyn cytology.
Silverman JF
Adv Anat Pathol; 2010 Nov; 17(6):437-44. PubMed ID: 20966649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Virtual slide telepathology for an academic teaching hospital surgical pathology quality assurance program.
Graham AR; Bhattacharyya AK; Scott KM; Lian F; Grasso LL; Richter LC; Carpenter JB; Chiang S; Henderson JT; Lopez AM; Barker GP; Weinstein RS
Hum Pathol; 2009 Aug; 40(8):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19540562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection and classification of diagnostic discrepancies (errors) in surgical pathology.
Roy JE; Hunt JL
Adv Anat Pathol; 2010 Sep; 17(5):359-65. PubMed ID: 20733354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical pathology sign-out. Routine review of every case by a second pathologist.
Safrin RE; Bark CJ
Am J Surg Pathol; 1993 Nov; 17(11):1190-2. PubMed ID: 8214266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of random and focused review in detecting surgical pathology error.
Raab SS; Grzybicki DM; Mahood LK; Parwani AV; Kuan SF; Rao UN
Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Dec; 130(6):905-12. PubMed ID: 19019767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outside case review of surgical pathology for referred patients: the impact on patient care.
Swapp RE; Aubry MC; Salomão DR; Cheville JC
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Feb; 137(2):233-40. PubMed ID: 22775269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Needle aspiration cytology of the breast: current perspective on the role in diagnosis and management].
Kocjan G
Acta Med Croatica; 2008 Oct; 62(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 19205416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anatomic pathology and patient safety: it's not an error: it's a diagnostic misadventure!
Grzybicki DM; Raab SS; Janosky JE; Vrbin-Turcsanyi C; Bruno S; Zarbo RJ; Stone CH; Meier FA; Geisinger KR; Gavin AJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Jan; 129(1):167-8; author reply 169. PubMed ID: 18183670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. How many cases need to be reviewed to compare performance in surgical pathology?
Renshaw AA; Young ML; Jiroutek MR
Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Mar; 119(3):388-91. PubMed ID: 12645341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
