228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12817497)
1. An evaluation of the lamb vision system as a predictor of lamb carcass red meat yield percentage.
Brady AS; Belk KE; LeValley SB; Dalsted NL; Scanga JA; Tatum JD; Smith GC
J Anim Sci; 2003 Jun; 81(6):1488-98. PubMed ID: 12817497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and validation of equations utilizing lamb vision system output to predict lamb carcass fabrication yields.
Cunha BC; Belk KE; Scanga JA; LeValley SB; Tatum JD; Smith GC
J Anim Sci; 2004 Jul; 82(7):2069-76. PubMed ID: 15309954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of wholesale lamb marketing options and merchandising styles on retail yield and fabrication time.
Lorenzen CL; Martin AM; Griffin DB; Dockerty TR; Walter JP; Johnson HK; Savell JW
J Anim Sci; 1997 Jan; 75(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9027541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Online evaluation of a commercial video image analysis system (Computer Vision System) to predict beef carcass red meat yield and for augmenting the assignment of USDA yield grades. United States Department of Agriculture.
Cannell RC; Belk KE; Tatum JD; Wise JW; Chapman PL; Scanga JA; Smith GC
J Anim Sci; 2002 May; 80(5):1195-201. PubMed ID: 12019606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Real-time augmentation of USDA yield grade application to beef carcasses using video image analysis.
Steiner R; Wyle AM; Vote DJ; Belk KE; Scanga JA; Wise JW; Tatum JD; Smith GC
J Anim Sci; 2003 Sep; 81(9):2239-46. PubMed ID: 12968699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the E+V video image analysis system as a predictor of pork carcass meat yield.
McClure EK; Scanga JA; Belk KE; Smith GC
J Anim Sci; 2003 May; 81(5):1193-201. PubMed ID: 12772846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dual-component video image analysis system (VIASCAN) as a predictor of beef carcass red meat yield percentage and for augmenting application of USDA yield grades.
Cannell RC; Tatum JD; Belk KE; Wise JW; Clayton RP; Smith GC
J Anim Sci; 1999 Nov; 77(11):2942-50. PubMed ID: 10568462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simulated instrument augmentation of USDA yield grade application to beef carcasses.
Belk KE; Scanga JA; Tatum JD; Wise JW; Smith GC
J Anim Sci; 1998 Feb; 76(2):522-7. PubMed ID: 9498361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Video image analysis as a potential grading system for Uruguayan beef carcasses.
Vote DJ; Bowling MB; Cunha BC; Belk KE; Tatum JD; Montossi F; Smith GC
J Anim Sci; 2009 Jul; 87(7):2376-90. PubMed ID: 19395512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization of biological types of cattle (Cycle VI): carcass, yield, and longissimus palatability traits.
Wheeler TL; Cundiff LV; Shackelford SD; Koohmaraie M
J Anim Sci; 2004 Apr; 82(4):1177-89. PubMed ID: 15080341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using current on-line carcass evaluation parameters to estimate boneless and bone-in pork carcass yield as influenced by trim level.
Berg EP; Grams DW; Miller RK; Wise JW; Forrest JC; Savell JW
J Anim Sci; 1999 Aug; 77(8):1977-84. PubMed ID: 10461971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Yield grades and cutability of carcass beef with and without kidney and pelvic fat.
Crouse JD; Koch RM; Dikeman ME
J Anim Sci; 1986 Oct; 63(4):1134-9. PubMed ID: 3771396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the Hennessy grading probe to predict yields of lamb carcasses fabricated to multiple end points.
Garrett RP; Edwards JW; Savell JW; Tatum JD
J Anim Sci; 1992 Apr; 70(4):1146-52. PubMed ID: 1582945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of an advanced automated ultrasonic scanner (AutoFom III) and a handheld optical probe (Destron PG-100) to determine lean yield in pork carcasses.
Dorleku JB; Wormsbecher L; Christensen M; Campbell CP; Mandell IB; Bohrer BM
J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 36807699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Technical note: the United States Department of Agriculture beef yield grade equation requires modification to reflect the current longissimus muscle area to hot carcass weight relationship.
Lawrence TE; Farrow RL; Zollinger BL; Spivey KS
J Anim Sci; 2008 Jun; 86(6):1434-8. PubMed ID: 18310492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diverse lamb genotypes 4. Predicting the yield of saleable meat and high value trimmed cuts from carcass measurements.
Safari E; Hopkins DL; Fogarty NM
Meat Sci; 2001 Jun; 58(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 22062117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Yield grade and carcass weight effects on the cutability of lamb carcasses fabricated into innovative style subprimals.
Garrett RP; Savell JW; Cross HR; Johnson HK
J Anim Sci; 1992 Jun; 70(6):1829-39. PubMed ID: 1634407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diverse lamb genotypes-1. Yield of saleable cuts and meat in the carcass and the prediction of yield.
Hopkins DL; Fogarty NM
Meat Sci; 1998 Aug; 49(4):459-75. PubMed ID: 22060627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On-line prediction of yield grade, longissimus muscle area, preliminary yield grade, adjusted preliminary yield grade, and marbling score using the MARC beef carcass image analysis system.
Shackelford SD; Wheeler TL; Koohmaraie M
J Anim Sci; 2003 Jan; 81(1):150-5. PubMed ID: 12597385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of body condition score on carcass characteristics and subprimal yield from cull beef cows.
Apple JK; Davis JC; Stephenson J; Hankins JE; Davis JR; Beaty SL
J Anim Sci; 1999 Oct; 77(10):2660-9. PubMed ID: 10521025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
