181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12817580)
1. HUGO Ethics Committee Statement on DNA sampling: control and access.
Knoppers BM; Hirtle M; Lormeau S; Laberge CM; Laflamme M;
Genetic Resour; 1998; 11(2):43-4. PubMed ID: 12817580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Misusing informed consent: a critique of limitations on research subjects' access to genetic research results.
Banks TM
Sask Law Rev; 2000; 63(2):539-80. PubMed ID: 12666671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The HUGO ethics committee: six innovative statements.
Wertz DC; Knoppers BM
New Rev Bioeth; 2003 Nov; 1(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 15706667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Should third party consent to research be mandated? Should there be a right for third parties to have data about them withdrawn from a research project? Two perspectives.
Delatycki M; Thomson C
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2004 Jan; 23(1):S75-86. PubMed ID: 15835025
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Safeguarding human genetic privacy.
Judicature; 2003; 86(5):224. PubMed ID: 15744895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Genetic testing and human subjects in research.
Laidlaw SA; Raffel LJ; Daar JF
Whittier Law Rev; 2002; 24(2):429-72. PubMed ID: 15085855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethics as an act of listening.
Lipworth W; Morrell B; Kerridge I
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Oct; 8(10):80-1. PubMed ID: 19003720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Untapped potential: IRB guidance for the ethical research use of stored biological materials.
Wolf LE; Lo B
IRB; 2004; 26(4):1-8. PubMed ID: 15449408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Community participation and representation in genetic studies: testing the application of fundamental ethical principles.
Brito A
St Thomas Law Rev; 2001; 13(4):935-43. PubMed ID: 12661583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. New Zealand Bioethics Conference February 2004: emerging biotechnologies: ethics and regulation.
Evans D
N Z Bioeth J; 2004 Feb; 5(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 15597488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Biobanks: oversight offers protection.
Hens K; Wright J; Dierickx K
Science; 2009 Nov; 326(5954):798-9; author reply 799. PubMed ID: 19892962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Consensus statement on genetic research in dementia.
Olde Rikkert MG; van der Vorm A; Burns A; Dekkers W; Robert P; Sartorius N; Selmes J; Stoppe G; Vernooij-Dassen M; Waldemar G
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen; 2008; 23(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 18509105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Open Questions.
Kaebnick GE
Hastings Cent Rep; 2016; 46(1):2. PubMed ID: 26786031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethical considerations of genetic testing.
Fleming DA
J Clin Ethics; 2002; 13(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 12793324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. What does it mean to be identifiable?
Hull SC; Wilfond BS
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Oct; 8(10):W7-8. PubMed ID: 19003695
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Genomic anonymity: have we already lost it?
Greenbaum D; Du J; Gerstein M
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Oct; 8(10):71-4. PubMed ID: 19003717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Whose genes are they anyway?
Nelkin D; Andrews LB
Chron High Educ; 1999 May; 45():B6. PubMed ID: 14598853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Personal genomes: when consent gets in the way.
Taylor P
Nature; 2008 Nov; 456(7218):32-3. PubMed ID: 18987719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethics, genetics and science policy.
Tranoy KE
Bull Med Ethics; 1992 Apr; (77):13-20. PubMed ID: 15997530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Research ethics. Children and population biobanks.
Gurwitz D; Fortier I; Lunshof JE; Knoppers BM
Science; 2009 Aug; 325(5942):818-9. PubMed ID: 19679798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
