136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12818603)
1. Finite element analysis of the stresses around fixtures in various reconstructed mandibular models--part II (effect of horizontal load).
Nagasao T; Kobayashi M; Tsuchiya Y; Kaneko T; Nakajima T
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2003 Jun; 31(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12818603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Finite element analysis of the stresses around endosseous implants in various reconstructed mandibular models.
Nagasao T; Kobayashi M; Tsuchiya Y; Kaneko T; Nakajima T
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2002 Jun; 30(3):170-77. PubMed ID: 12220996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: a 3D finite element analysis.
Simşek B; Erkmen E; Yilmaz D; Eser A
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Apr; 28(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 15979921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis investigating the biomechanical effects of human mandibular reconstruction with autogenous bone grafts.
Tie Y; Wang DM; Ji T; Wang CT; Zhang CP
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 34(5):290-8. PubMed ID: 16781160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of stresses occurring on three different zirconia dental implants: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Caglar A; Bal BT; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Ozkan S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 20209191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of different fixture geometries on the stress distribution in mandibular peri-implant structures: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Degerliyurt K; Simsek B; Erkmen E; Eser A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Aug; 110(2):e1-11. PubMed ID: 20598590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Stresses Around Dental Implants Placed in Normal and Fibula Reconstructed Mandibular Models using Finite Element Analysis.
Nesappan T; Ariga P
J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 Aug; 8(8):ZC45-50. PubMed ID: 25302267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical behavior of mandibles reconstructed with fibular grafts at different vertical positions using finite element method.
Cheng KJ; Liu YF; Wang JH; Jun JC; Jiang XF; Wang R; Baur DA
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Feb; 72(2):281-289. PubMed ID: 30482534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of the location and diameter of implants on the stress distribution in three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures under dynamic loads].
Lü J; Liu C; Lan J; Gao X
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 31(6):552-6. PubMed ID: 24437284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finite element analysis of non-axial versus axial loading of oral implants in the mandible of the dog.
Barbier L; Vander Sloten J; Krzesinski G; Schepers E; Van der Perre G
J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Nov; 25(11):847-58. PubMed ID: 9846905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical evaluation of implant placement in the reconstructed mandible.
Nagasao T; Miyamoto J; Kawana H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):999-1005. PubMed ID: 20162103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stress distribution and micromotion analyses of immediately loaded implants of varying lengths in the mandible and fibular bone grafts: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Wu JC; Chen CS; Yip SW; Hsu ML
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):e77-84. PubMed ID: 23057046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Finite element analysis of 2 immediate loading systems in edentulous mandible: rigid and semirigid splinting of implants.
Teixeira MF; Ramalho SA; de Mattias Sartori IA; Lehmann RB
Implant Dent; 2010 Feb; 19(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 20147815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative evaluation of the effect of diameter, length and number of implants supporting three-unit fixed partial prostheses on stress distribution in the bone.
Iplikçioğlu H; Akça K
J Dent; 2002 Jan; 30(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 11741734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three-dimensional finite element approach.
Baggi L; Pastore S; Di Girolamo M; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 23328192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical rationale for intentionally inclined implants in the posterior mandible using 3D finite element analysis.
Satoh T; Maeda Y; Komiyama Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(4):533-9. PubMed ID: 16161737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of stresses in implantation for grafted and plate-and-screw mandible reconstruction.
Nagasao T; Miyamoto J; Tamaki T; Kawana H
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Mar; 109(3):346-56. PubMed ID: 20097102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
