120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12819389)
41. In situ hybridization for human papillomavirus as a method of predicting the evolution of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Pich A; Margaria E; Ghiringhello B; Navone R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1992; 252(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 1329676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Is it possible to define a better ASCUS class in cervicovaginal screening? A review of 187 cases.
Guerrini L; Sama D; Visani M; Cotignoli T; Sintoni C; Maioli P; Lanzanova G; Schincaglia P
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(4):532-6. PubMed ID: 11480714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Colposcopy prediction of progression in human papillomavirus infections with minor cervical lesions.
Del Pino M; Torne A; Alonso I; Mula R; Masoller N; Fuste V; Ordi J
Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Dec; 116(6):1324-1331. PubMed ID: 21099598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. High-grade CIN on cervical biopsy and predictors of the subsequent cone histology results in women undergoing immediate conization.
Giannella L; Mfuta K; Gardini G; Rubino T; Fodero C; Prandi S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Mar; 186():68-74. PubMed ID: 25656975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Residual and recurrent lesions after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.
Milojkovic M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2002 Jan; 76(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 11818094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Clinical significance of ASCUS and ASC-H cytological abnormalities: a six-year experience at a single center.
Demirtas GS; Akman L; Demirtas O; Hursitoglu BS; Terek MC; Zekioglu O; Yilmaz H; Ozsaran AA
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2015; 36(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 26050352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A prospective study of colposcopy in women with mild dyskaryosis or koilocytosis.
Bolger BS; Lewis BV
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1988 Nov; 95(11):1117-9. PubMed ID: 3207640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Pathologist variation in reporting cervical borderline epithelial abnormalities and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Creagh T; Bridger JE; Kupek E; Fish DE; Martin-Bates E; Wilkins MJ
J Clin Pathol; 1995 Jan; 48(1):59-60. PubMed ID: 7706521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Prediction of recurrence after treatment for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: the role of human papillomavirus testing and age at conisation.
Verguts J; Bronselaer B; Donders G; Arbyn M; Van Eldere J; Drijkoningen M; Poppe W
BJOG; 2006 Nov; 113(11):1303-7. PubMed ID: 16978225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Rescreening of atypical cervicovaginal smears using PAPNET.
Lerma E; Colomo L; Carreras A; Esteva E; Quilez M; Prat J
Cancer; 1998 Dec; 84(6):361-5. PubMed ID: 9915138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [A cytofluorimetric analysis of the DNA content and S phase in intraepithelial neoplasia of the cervix uteri].
Monti F; Szymczuk S; Scarpellini M; Pini E; Fava C; Fulgenzi P; Papaleo R; Ravaioli A
Minerva Ginecol; 1995; 47(1-2):1-4. PubMed ID: 7770143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. ASCCP Risk-Based Colposcopy Recommendations Applied in Thai Women With Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance or Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Cytology.
Phianpiset R; Ruengkhachorn I; Jareemit N; Ittiamornlert P; Chaopotong P; Hanamornroongruang S; Horthongkham N
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Sep; 136(3):510-517. PubMed ID: 32769651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Human papillomavirus detection in cervical lesions nondiagnostic for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: correlation with Papanicolaou smear, colposcopy, and occurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Nuovo GJ; Blanco JS; Leipzig S; Smith D
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Jun; 75(6):1006-11. PubMed ID: 2160630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Morphological observation of cone biopsy and hysterectomy specimens of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Chen XD; Shi HY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jun; 43(6):429-32. PubMed ID: 19035137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Correlations between colposcopy and histologic results from colposcopically directed biopsy in cervical precancerous lesions.
Boicea A; Pătraşcu A; Surlin V; Iliescu D; Schenker M; Chiuţu L
Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2012; 53(3 Suppl):735-41. PubMed ID: 23188433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. High-risk HPV testing in women with borderline and mild dyskaryosis: long-term follow-up data and clinical relevance.
Denise Zielinski G; Snijders PJ; Rozendaal L; Voorhorst FJ; Runsink AP; de Schipper FA; Meijer CJ
J Pathol; 2001 Oct; 195(3):300-6. PubMed ID: 11673826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Management of abnormal cervical cytology screening in adolescent and young women in a canadian colposcopy centre: a descriptive analysis.
Bouchard-Fortier G; Paszat L; Murphy KJ
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Feb; 35(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 23470065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Grading cervical dysplasia with AgNORs using a semiautomated image analysis system.
Bharucha H; McCluggage G; Lee J; Bannister W; Kuan L; Wilhelm P; Nelson A
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1993 Oct; 15(5):323-8. PubMed ID: 8259973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Polymerase chain reaction-assisted evaluation of low and high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cytology and reappraisal of the Bethesda System.
Kühler-Obbarius C; Milde-Langosch K; Löning T; Stegner HE
Acta Cytol; 1994; 38(5):681-6. PubMed ID: 8091897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Should unsatisfactory colposcopy necessitate treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1?
Day T; Weitzen S; Cooper AS; Boardman LA
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2008 Jan; 12(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 18162806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
