BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12819894)

  • 1. [Stability and occlusion of six different femoral cement restrictors].
    Heisel C; Norman TL; Rupp R; Mau H; Breusch SJ
    Orthopade; 2003 Jun; 32(6):541-7. PubMed ID: 12819894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro performance of intramedullary cement restrictors in total hip arthroplasty.
    Heisel C; Norman T; Rupp R; Pritsch M; Ewerbeck V; Breusch SJ
    J Biomech; 2003 Jun; 36(6):835-43. PubMed ID: 12742451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cement restrictor function below the femoral isthmus.
    Moran M; Heisel C; Rupp R; Simpson AH; Breusch SJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 May; 458():111-6. PubMed ID: 17206103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Insertion of an expandable cement restrictor reduces intramedullary fat displacement.
    Breusch SJ; Heisel C
    J Arthroplasty; 2004 Sep; 19(6):739-44. PubMed ID: 15343534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Air permeable diaphyseal obturators: efficacity of femoral cementing and prevention of associated cardiovascular disorders].
    Caton J; Prudhon JL; Aslanian T; Lifante JC; Ritz B
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2002 Dec; 88(8):767-76. PubMed ID: 12503018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inferior stability of a biodegradable cement plug. 122 total hip replacements randomized to degradable or non-degradable cement restrictor.
    Schauss SM; Hinz M; Mayr E; Bach CM; Krismer M; Fischer M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Jul; 126(5):324-9. PubMed ID: 16612619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vivo failure analysis of intramedullary cement restrictors in 100 hip arthroplasties.
    Bitsch RG; Breusch SJ; Thomsen M; Schneider S; Heisel C
    Acta Orthop; 2007 Aug; 78(4):485-90. PubMed ID: 17966002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of 3 gelatine-based resorbable cement plugs: a study on 15 synthetic femurs and a prospective randomized study on 103 patients.
    Kroon M; Visser CP; Mootanah R; Brand R
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Dec; 77(6):893-8. PubMed ID: 17260197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An investigation of the performance of Biostop G and Hardinge bone plugs.
    Prendergast PJ; Birthistle P; Waide DV; Kumar NV
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1999; 213(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 10466367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of cement restrictors on the occlusion of the humeral canal: an in vitro comparative study of 2 devices.
    Danter MR; King GJ; Chess DG; Johnson JA; Faber KJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jan; 15(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 10654471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A prospective comparison of cement restrictor migration in primary total hip arthroplasty.
    Wembridge KR; Hamer AJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jan; 21(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 16446191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Femoral fissure after cement restrictor implantation].
    Schneider M; Heisel C; Breusch SJ
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(5):554-6. PubMed ID: 14551842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of a polyglycolide lactide cement plug restrictor in total hip arthroplasty.
    Yee AJ; Binnington AG; Hearn T; Protzner K; Fornasier VL; Davey JR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Jul; (364):254-66. PubMed ID: 10416416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of two different types of cement restrictors on the femoral cement mantle.
    Faraj AA; Rajasekar K
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2006 Dec; 72(6):702-8. PubMed ID: 17260607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of distal canal restrictors in primary cemented femoral hip arthroplasty.
    Smith EL; Wohlrab KP; Matzkin EG; Providence BC
    Orthopedics; 2004 Aug; 27(8):847-51. PubMed ID: 15369006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel technique for femoral canal occlusion during cement pressurization in proximal femoral arthroplasty.
    Holt G; Panousis K; Mohammed A; Patil S; Meek RM
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jan; 27(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 22152980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of 2 modern femoral cementing techniques: analysis by cement-bone interface pressure measurements, computerized image analysis, and static mechanical testing.
    Reading AD; McCaskie AW; Barnes MR; Gregg PJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):479-87. PubMed ID: 10884209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Femoral canal occlusion in total hip replacement using a resorbable and flexible cement restrictor.
    Bulstra SK; Geesink RG; Bakker D; Bulstra TH; Bouwmeester SJ; van der Linden AJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1996 Nov; 78(6):892-8. PubMed ID: 8951002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Cemented total hip arthroplasty in Germany--an update].
    Kreutzer J; Schneider M; Schlegel U; Ewerbeck V; Breusch SJ
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2005; 143(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 15754232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Cemented total hip arthroplasty in Germany - update 2010].
    Fischer CA; Kaszap B; Drexler C; Lehner B; Clarius M
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2012 Jun; 150(3):309-17. PubMed ID: 22354443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.