These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12819894)

  • 41. [Significance of jet lavage for in vitro and in vivo cement penetration].
    Breusch SJ; Schneider U; Reitzel T; Kreutzer J; Ewerbeck V; Lukoschek M
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2001; 139(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 11253523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Technique for a composite femoral intramedullary plug in cemented hip arthroplasty.
    Owens P; Lavernia CJ
    J Arthroplasty; 1999 Apr; 14(3):369-71. PubMed ID: 10220192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. An in vitro study of femoral intramedullary pressures during hip replacement using modern cement technique.
    Song Y; Goodman SB; Jaffe RA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 May; (302):297-304. PubMed ID: 8168317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A composite plug for occluding the femoral canal prior to cementing a total hip femoral component.
    McLaughlin JR; Harris WH
    Orthop Rev; 1994 Apr; 23(4):344-6. PubMed ID: 8008445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Precooling of the femoral canal enhances shear strength at the cement-prosthesis interface and reduces the polymerization temperature.
    Hsieh PH; Tai CL; Chang YH; Lee MS; Shih HN; Shih CH
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Sep; 24(9):1809-14. PubMed ID: 16865715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Does increased cement pressure produce superior femoral component fixation?
    Dozier JK; Harrigan T; Kurtz WH; Hawkins C; Hill R
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):488-95. PubMed ID: 10884210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Cement removal and bone bed preparation of the femoral medullary canal assisted by flexible endoscope in total hip revision arthroplasty.
    Takagi M; Tamaki Y; Kobayashi S; Sasaki K; Takakubo Y; Ishii M
    J Orthop Sci; 2009 Nov; 14(6):719-26. PubMed ID: 19997818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Femoral cementing techniques: current trends in the UK.
    Nedungayil SK; Mehendele S; Gheduzzi S; Learmonth ID
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2006 Mar; 88(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 16551398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Poor results with the Shuttle Stop: resorbable versus nonresorbable intramedullar cement restrictor in a prospective and randomized study with a 2-year follow-up.
    Freund KG; Herold N; Røck ND; Riegels-Nielsen P
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2003 Feb; 74(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 12635790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Can plate osteosynthesis of periprosthethic femoral fractures cause cement mantle failure around a stable hip stem? A biomechanical analysis.
    Giesinger K; Ebneter L; Day RE; Stoffel KK; Yates PJ; Kuster MS
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1308-12. PubMed ID: 24439999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [A new method to optimize the adhesion between bone cement and acetabular bone in total hip arthroplasty].
    Wirtz DC; Lelgemann B; Jungwirth F; Niethard FU; Marx R
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 12695959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. What is the upper limit of cement penetration for different femoral hip resurfacing components?
    Bitsch RG; Obermeyer BJ; Rieger JS; Jäger S; Schmalzried TP; Bischel OE
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Apr; 28(4):654-62. PubMed ID: 23246349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cement applicator use for hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Jaeger S; Rieger JS; Obermeyer B; Klotz MC; Kretzer JP; Bitsch RG
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 May; 37(5):447-52. PubMed ID: 25772262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Effect of femoral intramedullary irrigation on periprosthetic cement distribution: jet lavage versus syringe lavage].
    Wirtz D; Sellei RM; Portheine F; Prescher A; Weber M
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2001; 139(5):410-4. PubMed ID: 11605292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.
    Digas G
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Feb; 76(315):3-82. PubMed ID: 15790289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Short-term aseptic loosening of the femoral component in canine total hip replacement: effects of cementing technique on cement mantle grade.
    Ota J; Cook JL; Lewis DD; Tomlinson JL; Fox DB; Cook CR; Schultz LG; Brumitt J
    Vet Surg; 2005; 34(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16212589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Initial stability of an implanted cement-canal prosthesis. Results in experimental studies on human cadaver femurs].
    Jansson V; Zimmer M; Kühne JH; Sailer FP
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1993; 131(4):377-81. PubMed ID: 8212817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
    Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Cement delivery depends on cement gun performance and cement viscosity].
    Heisel C; Schelling K; Thomsen M; Schneider U; Breusch SJ
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 12605338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Effect of ultrasonic shock waves on the bone-bone cement interface].
    Hach J; Benes A; Hani AB; Sosna A; Sunka P
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(5):300-3. PubMed ID: 11759472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.