226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12819916)
1. Suspected ureteral colic: plain film and sonography vs unenhanced helical CT. A prospective study in 66 patients.
Ripollés T; Agramunt M; Errando J; Martínez MJ; Coronel B; Morales M
Eur Radiol; 2004 Jan; 14(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 12819916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can computed tomography scout radiography replace plain film in the evaluation of patients with acute urinary tract colic?
Ege G; Akman H; Kuzucu K; Yildiz S
Acta Radiol; 2004 Jul; 45(4):469-73. PubMed ID: 15323403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced helical computed tomography for the assessment of acute renal colic: prospective comparative study.
Kim BS; Hwang IK; Choi YW; Namkung S; Kim HC; Hwang WC; Choi KM; Park JK; Han TI; Kang W
Acta Radiol; 2005 Nov; 46(7):756-63. PubMed ID: 16372698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can noncontrast helical computed tomography replace intravenous urography for evaluation of patients with acute urinary tract colic?
Chen MY; Zagoria RJ
J Emerg Med; 1999; 17(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 10195491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Spiral computerized tomography without perfusion of contrast media as first line investigation in patients with renal colic].
Romano S; Rollandi GA; Scaglione M; Biscaldi E; Cantoni S; Rebaudi F; Del Vecchio A; Grassi R
Radiol Med; 2000 Oct; 100(4):251-6. PubMed ID: 11155452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Suspected ureteral colic: primary helical CT versus selective helical CT after unenhanced radiography and sonography.
Catalano O; Nunziata A; Altei F; Siani A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):379-87. PubMed ID: 11804898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trends in the use of unenhanced helical CT for acute urinary colic.
Chen MY; Zagoria RJ; Saunders HS; Dyer RB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Dec; 173(6):1447-50. PubMed ID: 10584780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of ureteral calculi in patients with suspected renal colic: value of reformatted noncontrast helical CT.
Sommer FG; Jeffrey RB; Rubin GD; Napel S; Rimmer SA; Benford J; Harter PM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Sep; 165(3):509-13. PubMed ID: 7645461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Plain abdominal radiography with transabdominal native tissue harmonic imaging ultrasonography vs unenhanced computed tomography in renal colic.
Mitterberger M; Pinggera GM; Pallwein L; Gradl J; Feuchtner G; Plattner R; Neururer R; Bartsch G; Strasser H; Frauscher F
BJU Int; 2007 Oct; 100(4):887-90. PubMed ID: 17608825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensitivity of CT scout radiography and abdominal radiography for revealing ureteral calculi on helical CT: implications for radiologic follow-up.
Assi Z; Platt JF; Francis IR; Cohan RH; Korobkin M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Aug; 175(2):333-7. PubMed ID: 10915669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical characteristics of ureteral calculi detected by nonenhanced computerized tomography after unclear results of plain radiography and ultrasonography.
Kobayashi T; Nishizawa K; Watanabe J; Ogura K
J Urol; 2003 Sep; 170(3):799-802. PubMed ID: 12913701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective comparison of unenhanced spiral computed tomography and intravenous urography in the evaluation of acute renal colic.
Wang JH; Shen SH; Huang SS; Chang CY
J Chin Med Assoc; 2008 Jan; 71(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 18218557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nonenhanced helical CT and US in the emergency evaluation of patients with renal colic: prospective comparison.
Sheafor DH; Hertzberg BS; Freed KS; Carroll BA; Keogan MT; Paulson EK; DeLong DM; Nelson RC
Radiology; 2000 Dec; 217(3):792-7. PubMed ID: 11110945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low-dose unenhanced multidetector CT of patients with suspected renal colic.
Tack D; Sourtzis S; Delpierre I; de Maertelaer V; Gevenois PA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Feb; 180(2):305-11. PubMed ID: 12540420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiologic investigation of renal colic: unenhanced helical CT compared with excretory urography.
Sourtzis S; Thibeau JF; Damry N; Raslan A; Vandendris M; Bellemans M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jun; 172(6):1491-4. PubMed ID: 10350278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation of ureteral stone measurements by CT and plain film radiography: utility of the KUB.
Katz D; McGahan JP; Gerscovich EO; Troxel SA; Low RK
J Endourol; 2003 Dec; 17(10):847-50. PubMed ID: 14744346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. One year's clinical experience with unenhanced spiral computed tomography for the assessment of acute loin pain suggestive of renal colic.
Greenwell TJ; Woodhams S; Denton ER; MacKenzie A; Rankin SC; Popert R
BJU Int; 2000 Apr; 85(6):632-6. PubMed ID: 10759655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultrasound vs CT for the detection of ureteric stones in patients with renal colic.
Patlas M; Farkas A; Fisher D; Zaghal I; Hadas-Halpern I
Br J Radiol; 2001 Oct; 74(886):901-4. PubMed ID: 11675305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Renal colic: comparison of spiral CT, US and IVU in the detection of ureteral calculi.
Yilmaz S; Sindel T; Arslan G; Ozkaynak C; Karaali K; Kabaalioğlu A; Lüleci E
Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(2):212-7. PubMed ID: 9477267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrasonography and plain film versus intravenous urography in ureteric colic.
Dalla Palma L; Stacul F; Bazzocchi M; Pagnan L; Festini G; Marega D
Clin Radiol; 1993 May; 47(5):333-6. PubMed ID: 8508595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
