171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12820010)
1. [How can artificial eye motility be improved? The influence of fornix configuration and tissue thickness in front of hydroxyapatite-silicon implants in 66 patients].
Klett A; Guthoff R
Ophthalmologe; 2003 Jun; 100(6):445-8. PubMed ID: 12820010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Muscle pedunculated scleral flaps. A microsurgical modification to improve prosthesis motility].
Klett A; Guthoff R
Ophthalmologe; 2003 Jun; 100(6):449-52. PubMed ID: 12820011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative motility of hydroxyapatite and alloplastic enucleation implants.
Custer PL; Trinkaus KM; Fornoff J
Ophthalmology; 1999 Mar; 106(3):513-6. PubMed ID: 10080207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Functional and cosmetic relevance of primary orbital implants].
Kohlhaas M; Schulz D
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2003 Jun; 220(6):418-22. PubMed ID: 12830397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experience with the polymer-coated hydroxyapatite implant after enucleation in 126 patients.
Shields CL; Uysal Y; Marr BP; Lally SE; Rodriques E; Kharod B; Shields JA
Ophthalmology; 2007 Feb; 114(2):367-73. PubMed ID: 17270685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Prevention of postenucleation syndrome: the hydroxylapatite silicone implant. Preliminary experimental studies and initial clinical experiences].
Guthoff R; Vick HP; Schaudig U
Ophthalmologe; 1995 Apr; 92(2):198-205. PubMed ID: 7780281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Experience with orbital implants in particular with porous hydroxyapatite materials].
Norda AG; Meyer-Rüsenberg HW
Ophthalmologe; 2003 Jun; 100(6):437-44. PubMed ID: 12820009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Orbital implants in enucleation surgery: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Custer PL; Kennedy RH; Woog JJ; Kaltreider SA; Meyer DR
Ophthalmology; 2003 Oct; 110(10):2054-61. PubMed ID: 14522788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Orbital implants of coralline hydroxyapatite as eye replacement after enucleation].
Busin M; Mönks T; Menzel C
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1994 Jun; 204(6):518-22. PubMed ID: 7933898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Complications of primary placement of motility post in porous polyethylene implants during enucleation.
Yazici B; Akova B; Sanli O
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 May; 143(5):828-834. PubMed ID: 17362860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between motility of biointegratable and silicone orbital implants.
González-Candial M; Umaña MA; Galvez C; Medel R; Ayala E
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):711-2. PubMed ID: 17386291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The 'baseball' orbital implant: a prospective study.
Leatherbarrow B; Kwartz J; Sunderland S; Brammar R; Nichol E
Eye (Lond); 1994; 8 ( Pt 5)():569-76. PubMed ID: 7835455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Late porous polyethylene implant exposure after motility coupling post placement.
Cheng MS; Liao SL; Lin LL
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Sep; 138(3):420-4. PubMed ID: 15364224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A study of the hydroxyapatite orbital implant drilling procedure.
Ashworth J; Brammar R; Inkster C; Leatherbarrow B
Eye (Lond); 1998; 12 ( Pt 1)():37-42. PubMed ID: 9614514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Postnucleation orbital implants.
Henc-Petrinović L; Ritz-Mutevelić L; Dosen-Maricić V; Petelin M; Gabrić N
Acta Med Croatica; 1991; 45(4-5):369-75. PubMed ID: 1726522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exposure rate of hydroxyapatite orbital implants a 15-year experience of 802 cases.
Yoon JS; Lew H; Kim SJ; Lee SY
Ophthalmology; 2008 Mar; 115(3):566-572.e2. PubMed ID: 17854900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Late exposure of the bioceramic orbital implant.
Wang JK; Lai PC; Liao SL
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 147(1):162-170.e1. PubMed ID: 18571617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The smooth surface tunnel porous polyethylene enucleation implant.
Woog JJ; Dresner SC; Lee TS; Kim YD; Hartstein ME; Shore JW; Neuhaus RW; Kaltreider SA; Migliori ME; Mandeville JT; Roh JH; Amato MM
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2004; 35(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15497545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of motility: autogenous dermis-fat vs synthetic spherical implants.
Bosniak SL; Nesi F; Smith BC; Schechter B; Cote R
Ophthalmic Surg; 1989 Dec; 20(12):889-91. PubMed ID: 2630970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perspective on orbital enucleation implants.
Sami D; Young S; Petersen R
Surv Ophthalmol; 2007; 52(3):244-65. PubMed ID: 17472801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
