These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12820854)

  • 21. Quantitative coronary arteriography: efficient correction of catheter calibrated vessel measurement.
    Fischer F; Wunderlich W; Noring J; Linderer T
    Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 1():724. PubMed ID: 8591310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Yao JC; Chang HF
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 15132440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [The effect of conical radiographic projection: a study in 3D].
    Kouame P; Rousset MM; Dubus JP; Amanthi D
    Odontostomatol Trop; 1999 Sep; 22(87):5-11. PubMed ID: 11372156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. 3D CT-based cephalometric analysis: 3D cephalometric theoretical concept and software.
    Olszewski R; Cosnard G; Macq B; Mahy P; Reychler H
    Neuroradiology; 2006 Nov; 48(11):853-62. PubMed ID: 17009024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Customization of a generic 3D model of the distal femur using diagnostic radiographs.
    Schmutz B; Reynolds KJ; Slavotinek JP
    J Med Eng Technol; 2008; 32(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 18297506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Distortion and magnification of four digital cephalometric units.
    Song GY; Li G; Lu WH; Han B; Xu TM
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1644-1653. PubMed ID: 31793469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Automatic computerized radiographic identification of cephalometric landmarks.
    Rudolph DJ; Sinclair PM; Coggins JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Feb; 113(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 9484208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Software for automated application of a reference-based method for a posteriori determination of the effective radiographic imaging geometry.
    Schulze RK; Weinheimer O; Brüllmann DD; Röder F; d'Hoedt B; Schoemer E
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Jul; 34(4):205-11. PubMed ID: 15961593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Lateral teleradiography of the cranium: the effect of head positioning in the interpretation of cephalometric tracings. An experimental study on a phantom].
    Blanc M; Garattini G; Moruzzi E
    Radiol Med; 1997 Oct; 94(4):302-7. PubMed ID: 9465234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pose determination of a blade implant in three dimensions from a single two-dimensional radiograph.
    Toti P; Barone A; Marconcini S; Menchini-Fabris GB; Martuscelli R; Covani U
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 May; 47(4):20170258. PubMed ID: 29227154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A critical appraisal of measurement of the soft tissue outline using photographs and video.
    Benson PE; Richmond S
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Aug; 19(4):397-409. PubMed ID: 9308261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Automatic Analysis of Lateral Cephalograms Based on Multiresolution Decision Tree Regression Voting.
    Wang S; Li H; Li J; Zhang Y; Zou B
    J Healthc Eng; 2018; 2018():1797502. PubMed ID: 30581546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Natural reference structures in the human mandible: a systematic search in children with tantalum implants.
    Springate SD
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):354-62. PubMed ID: 20080959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [The influence of training on the accuracy of roentgenographic cephalometric tracings (author's transl)].
    Jonas I
    Radiologe; 1976 Oct; 16(10):427-31. PubMed ID: 996272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A method for three-dimensional image reformation for quantitative cephalometric analysis.
    Matteson SR; Bechtold W; Phillips C; Staab EV
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1989 Oct; 47(10):1053-61. PubMed ID: 2795298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A method for three-projection infant cephalometry.
    Hermann NV; Jensen BL; Dahl E; Darvann TA; Kreiborg S
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2001 Jul; 38(4):299-316. PubMed ID: 11420009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development of a system for craniofacial analysis from monitor-displayed digital images.
    Gotfredsen E; Kragskov J; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 10522202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The evaluation of a novel haptic-enabled virtual reality approach for computer-aided cephalometry.
    Medellín-Castillo HI; Govea-Valladares EH; Pérez-Guerrero CN; Gil-Valladares J; Lim T; Ritchie JM
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Jul; 130():46-53. PubMed ID: 27208520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Automatic 3D cephalometric annotation system using shadowed 2D image-based machine learning.
    Lee SM; Kim HP; Jeon K; Lee SH; Seo JK
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Feb; 64(5):055002. PubMed ID: 30669128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cephalometric errors: a comparison between repeat measurements and retaken radiographs.
    Cooke MS; Wei SH
    Aust Dent J; 1991 Feb; 36(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 2029231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.