These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12820864)

  • 1. Event-related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension.
    van Berkum JJ; Brown CM; Hagoort P; Zwitserlood P
    Psychophysiology; 2003 Mar; 40(2):235-48. PubMed ID: 12820864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Who are you talking about? Tracking discourse-level referential processing with event-related brain potentials.
    Nieuwland MS; Otten M; Van Berkum JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Feb; 19(2):228-36. PubMed ID: 17280512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The interplay between semantic and referential aspects of anaphoric noun phrase resolution: Evidence from ERPs.
    Nieuwland MS; Van Berkum JJ
    Brain Lang; 2008 Aug; 106(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 18556057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The interplay between referential processing and local syntactic/semantic processing: ERPs to written Chinese discourse.
    Yu J; Zhang Y; Boland JE; Cai L
    Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 1597():139-58. PubMed ID: 25511994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Establishing reference in language comprehension: an electrophysiological perspective.
    Van Berkum JJ; Koornneef AW; Otten M; Nieuwland MS
    Brain Res; 2007 May; 1146():158-71. PubMed ID: 16916496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On sense and reference: examining the functional neuroanatomy of referential processing.
    Nieuwland MS; Petersson KM; Van Berkum JJ
    Neuroimage; 2007 Sep; 37(3):993-1004. PubMed ID: 17611124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ERPs reveal sensitivity to hypothetical contexts in spoken discourse.
    Dwivedi VD; Drury JE; Molnar M; Phillips NA; Baum S; Steinhauer K
    Neuroreport; 2010 Aug; 21(11):791-5. PubMed ID: 20574414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discourse before gender: an event-related brain potential study on the interplay of semantic and syntactic information during spoken language understanding.
    Brown CM; van Berkum JJ; Hagoort P
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2000 Jan; 29(1):53-68. PubMed ID: 10723710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discourse, syntax, and prosody: the brain reveals an immediate interaction.
    Kerkhofs R; Vonk W; Schriefers H; Chwilla DJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Sep; 19(9):1421-34. PubMed ID: 17714005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitivity to Referential Ambiguity in Discourse: The Role of Attention, Working Memory, and Verbal Ability.
    Boudewyn MA; Long DL; Traxler MJ; Lesh TA; Dave S; Mangun GR; Carter CS; Swaab TY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 27(12):2309-23. PubMed ID: 26401815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect.
    van Berkum JJ; Zwitserlood P; Hagoort P; Brown CM
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Oct; 17(3):701-18. PubMed ID: 14561457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is animacy special? ERP correlates of semantic violations and animacy violations in sentence processing.
    Szewczyk JM; Schriefers H
    Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1368():208-21. PubMed ID: 21029726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech and span: working memory capacity impacts the use of animacy but not of world knowledge during spoken sentence comprehension.
    Nakano H; Saron C; Swaab TY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Dec; 22(12):2886-98. PubMed ID: 19929760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Event-Related Potentials Accompanying Processing Referentially Ambiguous Pronouns in Russian].
    Yurchenko AN; Fedorova OV; Kurgansky AV; Machinskaya RI
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2016 Sep; 66(5):590-599. PubMed ID: 30695404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Event-related potentials index lexical retrieval (N400) and integration (P600) during language comprehension.
    Delogu F; Brouwer H; Crocker MW
    Brain Cogn; 2019 Oct; 135():103569. PubMed ID: 31202158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrophysiological comparison of grammatical processing and semantic processing of single spoken nouns.
    Thierry G; Cardebat D; Démonet JF
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Oct; 17(3):535-47. PubMed ID: 14561443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in the processing of anaphoric reference between closely related languages: neurophysiological evidence.
    Lamers MJ; Jansma BM; Hammer A; Münte TF
    BMC Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 9():55. PubMed ID: 18588672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Syntactic and referential processes in second-language learners: event-related brain potential evidence.
    Isel F
    Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1885-9. PubMed ID: 18007180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The processing of animacy in noun-classifier combinations in reading Korean: An ERP study.
    Jin L
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Oct; 126():23-32. PubMed ID: 30098583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.