These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12821354)
1. Performance of ThinPrep liquid-based cervical cytology in comparison with conventionally prepared Papanicolaou smears: a quantitative survey. Abulafia O; Pezzullo JC; Sherer DM Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Jul; 90(1):137-44. PubMed ID: 12821354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Utility of liquid-based cytology for cervical carcinoma screening: results of a population-based study conducted in a region of Costa Rica with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma. Hutchinson ML; Zahniser DJ; Sherman ME; Herrero R; Alfaro M; Bratti MC; Hildesheim A; Lorincz AT; Greenberg MD; Morales J; Schiffman M Cancer; 1999 Apr; 87(2):48-55. PubMed ID: 10227593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. ThinPrep versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in the cytologic follow-up of women with equivocal cervical smears. Negri G; Menia E; Egarter-Vigl E; Vittadello F; Mian C Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):342-5. PubMed ID: 14681941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cytohistologic correlation rates between conventional Papanicolaou smears and ThinPrep cervical cytology: a comparison. Chacho MS; Mattie ME; Schwartz PE Cancer; 2003 Jun; 99(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 12811853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of fluid-based, thin-layer processing and conventional Papanicolaou methods for uterine cervical cytology. Wang TY; Chen HS; Yang YC; Tsou MC J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Jul; 98(7):500-5. PubMed ID: 10463000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of ThinPrep preparation of cervical smears: a 1,000-case, investigator-sponsored study. Awen C; Hathway S; Eddy W; Voskuil R; Janes C Diagn Cytopathol; 1994; 11(1):33-6; discussion 36-7. PubMed ID: 7956657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Liquid-based cytology--new possibilities in the diagnosis of cervical lesions. Juric D; Mahovlić V; Rajhvajn S; Ovanin-Rakić A; Skopljanac-Macina L; Barisić A; Projić IS; Babić D; Susa M; Corusić A; Oresković S Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 20432728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Liquid phase cytology in the primary screening for cervical cancer: a multicenter study]. Monsonégo J; Autillo-Touati A; Bergeron C; Dachez R; Liaras J; Saurel J; Zerat L; Chatelain P; Mottot C Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2001 Nov; 29(11):799-807. PubMed ID: 11770273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of reading liquid based cytology slides using the ThinPrep Imager compared with conventional cytology: prospective study. Davey E; d'Assuncao J; Irwig L; Macaskill P; Chan SF; Richards A; Farnsworth A BMJ; 2007 Jul; 335(7609):31. PubMed ID: 17604301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Liquid-based cervical cytologic smear study and conventional Papanicolaou smears: a metaanalysis of prospective studies comparing cytologic diagnosis and sample adequacy. Bernstein SJ; Sanchez-Ramos L; Ndubisi B Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Aug; 185(2):308-17. PubMed ID: 11518884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Positive predictive value of liquid-based and conventional cervical Papanicolaou smears reported as malignant. Uyar DS; Eltabbakh GH; Mount SL Gynecol Oncol; 2003 May; 89(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 12713984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cytologic features of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in thinprep papanicolaou test slides and conventional smears: comparison of cases that performed poorly with those that performed well in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology. Renshaw AA; Dubray-Benstein B; Haja J; Hughes JH; Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Jan; 129(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 15628904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oral contraceptive pills are associated with artifacts in ThinPrep Pap smears that mimic low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Morrison C; Prokorym P; Piquero C; Wakely PE; Nuovo GJ Cancer; 2003 Apr; 99(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 12704686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Split-sample analysis of discarded cells from liquid-based Pap smear sampling devices. Rinas AC; Mittman BW; Le LV; Hartmann K; Cayless J; Singh HK Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 16514841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of a fluid-based, thin-layer papanicolaou smear method in the clinical setting of an independent laboratory and an outpatient screening population in New England. Díaz-Rosario LA; Kabawat SE Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1999 Sep; 123(9):817-21. PubMed ID: 10458830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conventional cervical cytologic smears vs. ThinPrep smears. A paired comparison study on cervical cytology. Ferenczy A; Robitaille J; Franco E; Arseneau J; Richart RM; Wright TC Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(6):1136-42. PubMed ID: 8960019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The clinical value of digene hybrid capture HPV DNA testing in a referral-based population with abnormal pap smears. Recio FO; Sahai Srivastava BI; Wong C; Hempling RE; Eltabbakh GH; Piver MS Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1998; 19(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 9641214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An Australian trial of ThinPrep: a new cytopreparatory technique. Laverty CR; Thurloe JK; Redman NL; Farnsworth A Cytopathology; 1995 Jun; 6(3):140-8. PubMed ID: 7669924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Liquid-based cytology and conventional cervical smears: a comparison study in an Asian screening population. Cheung AN; Szeto EF; Leung BS; Khoo US; Ng AW Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):331-5. PubMed ID: 14681939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]