224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12821354)
21. Liquid-based cytology: evaluation of effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and application to present practice.
Cox JT
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2004 Nov; 2(6):597-611. PubMed ID: 19780303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Papanicolaou and thin-layer cervical cytology with colposcopic biopsy control. A comparison.
Harkness CB; Theofrastous JP; Ibrahim SN; Galvin SL; Lawrence HC
J Reprod Med; 2003 Sep; 48(9):681-6. PubMed ID: 14562631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cytologic features of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in ThinPrep Papanicolaou test slides: comparison of cases that performed poorly with those that performed well in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology.
Renshaw AA; Schulte MA; Plott E; Dubray-Benstein B; Cobb CJ; Lozano RL; Neal MH; Hughes JH; Young NA; Prey M
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2004 Jul; 128(7):746-8. PubMed ID: 15214829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Interobserver variability: comparison between liquid-based and conventional preparations in gynecologic cytology.
Chhieng DC; Talley LI; Roberson J; Gatscha RM; Jhala NC; Elgert PA
Cancer; 2002 Apr; 96(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 11954023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Hyperchromatic crowded groups in cervical cytology--differing appearances and interpretations in conventional and ThinPrep preparations: a study from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology.
Renshaw AA; Mody DR; Wang E; Haja J; Colgan TJ;
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Mar; 130(3):332-6. PubMed ID: 16519560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of the ThinPrep Pap test in clinical practice. A seven-month, 16,314-case experience in northern Vermont.
Papillo JL; Zarka MA; St John TL
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 9479341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effectiveness of liquid-based cytology and papanicolaou tests in a low risk population.
Lerma E; Quintana MJ; Quilez M; Esteva E; Carreras A; Bonfill X; Prat J; Calaf J
Acta Cytol; 2007; 51(3):399-406. PubMed ID: 17536542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Significance of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance on ThinPrep papanicolaou smears.
Eltabbakh GH; Lipman JN; Mount SL; Morgan A
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Oct; 79(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11006029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of the sensitivity of conventional cytology and the ThinPrep Imaging System for 1,083 biopsy confirmed high-grade squamous lesions.
Halford JA; Batty T; Boost T; Duhig J; Hall J; Lee C; Walker K
Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 May; 38(5):318-26. PubMed ID: 19813268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and a fluid-based, thin-layer system for cervical cancer screening.
Lee KR; Ashfaq R; Birdsong GG; Corkill ME; McIntosh KM; Inhorn SL
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 90(2):278-84. PubMed ID: 9241308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Altered recognition of reparative changes in ThinPrep specimens in the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytology Program.
Snyder TM; Renshaw AA; Styer PE; Mody DR; Colgan TJ;
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Jul; 129(7):861-5. PubMed ID: 15974808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. ThinPrep Pap Test. Accuracy for glandular disease.
Ashfaq R; Gibbons D; Vela C; Saboorian MH; Iliya F
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 9987455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of performance of conventional and ThinPrep gynecologic preparations in the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytology Program.
Renshaw AA; Young NA; Birdsong GG; Styer PE; Davey DD; Mody DR; Colgan TJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2004 Jan; 128(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 14692817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy of diagnosis of atypical glandular cells - Conventional and ThinPrep.
Ramsaroop R; Chu I
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Sep; 34(9):614-9. PubMed ID: 16900475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Characteristics of false-negative ThinPrep cervical smears in women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Leung KM; Lam KK; Tse PY; Yeoh GP; Chan KW
Hong Kong Med J; 2008 Aug; 14(4):292-5. PubMed ID: 18685162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Testing automated liquid-based cytology samples with a manual liquid-based cytology method using residual cell suspensions from 500 ThinPrep cases.
Maksem JA; Dhanwada V; Trueblood JE; Weidmann J; Kane B; Bolick DR; Bedrossian CW; Kurtycz DF; Stewart J
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Jun; 34(6):391-6. PubMed ID: 16680773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. SpinThin, a simple, inexpensive technique for preparation of thin-layer cervical cytology from liquid-based specimens: data on 791 cases.
Khalbuss WE; Rudomina D; Kauff ND; Chuang L; Melamed MR
Cancer; 2000 Jun; 90(3):135-42. PubMed ID: 10896326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Performance of the CellSolutions Glucyte liquid-based cytology in comparison with the ThinPrep and SurePath methods.
Alaghehbandan R
Acta Cytol; 2013; 57(2):189-97. PubMed ID: 23407055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of Efficacy and Accuracy of Cervical Cytology Screening With Artificial Intelligence Assistive System.
Bai X; Wei J; Starr D; Zhang X; Wu X; Guo Y; Liu Y; Ma X; Wei Y; Li C; Zilla ML; Zhang W; Zeng X; Zhao C
Mod Pathol; 2024 Jun; 37(6):100486. PubMed ID: 38588882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The ThinPrep Pap test. A review of clinical studies.
Linder J; Zahniser D
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 9022723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
