190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12822049)
1. Introducing new technologies: protecting subjects of surgical innovation and research.
McKneally MF; Daar AS
World J Surg; 2003 Aug; 27(8):930-4; discussion 934-5. PubMed ID: 12822049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Emergency innovation: implications for the trauma surgeon.
Pretz JL; Magnus D; Spain DA
J Trauma; 2009 Dec; 67(6):1443-7. PubMed ID: 20009701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
American Society of Clinical Oncology
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Should society allow research ethics boards to be run as for-profit enterprises?
Emanuel EJ; Lemmens T; Elliot C
PLoS Med; 2006 Jul; 3(7):e309. PubMed ID: 16848618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgical innovation: the ethical agenda: A systematic review.
Broekman ML; Carrière ME; Bredenoord AL
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Jun; 95(25):e3790. PubMed ID: 27336866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Impact of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) on Clinical Innovation: A Survey of Investigators and IRB Members.
Stryjewski TP; Kalish BT; Silverman B; Lehmann LS
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Dec; 10(5):481-7. PubMed ID: 26564945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving the decision processes of institutional review boards.
Wagner TH
JAMA; 2004 Apr; 291(14):1698; author reply 1698-9. PubMed ID: 15082694
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Understanding institutional review boards: practical guidance to the IRB review process.
Pech C; Cob N; Cejka JT
Nutr Clin Pract; 2007 Dec; 22(6):618-28. PubMed ID: 18042949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical ethics and the challenge of surgical innovation.
Angelos P
Am J Surg; 2014 Dec; 208(6):881-5. PubMed ID: 25450589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The purpose, composition, and function of an institutional review board: balancing priorities.
Enfield KB; Truwit JD
Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1330-6. PubMed ID: 18811996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethical issues in phase I oncology research: a comparison of investigators and institutional review board chairpersons.
Kodish E; Stocking C; Ratain MJ; Kohrman A; Siegler M
J Clin Oncol; 1992 Nov; 10(11):1810-6. PubMed ID: 1403062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Real-Time IRB: A Collaborative Innovation to Decrease IRB Review Time.
Spellecy R; Eve AM; Connors ER; Shaker R; Clark DC
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Oct; 13(4):432-437. PubMed ID: 29902956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How to do human-subjects research if you do not have an institutional review board.
Rice TW
Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1362-7. PubMed ID: 18812001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computerized information management for institutional review boards.
Hood MN; Gugerty B; Levine R; Ho VB
Comput Inform Nurs; 2005; 23(4):190-8; quiz 199-200. PubMed ID: 16027533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Innovation in pediatric surgery: the surgical innovation continuum and the ETHICAL model.
Schwartz JA
J Pediatr Surg; 2014 Apr; 49(4):639-45. PubMed ID: 24726128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethics and surgical innovation: challenges to the professionalism of surgeons.
Angelos P
Int J Surg; 2013; 11 Suppl 1():S2-5. PubMed ID: 24380544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [How to get an institutional review board (IRB) approval for clinical research].
Letouzey V; Deffieux X
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2010 Nov; 38(11):716-7. PubMed ID: 21030279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Institutional Review Board approval and innovation in urology: current practice and safety issues.
Sundaram V; Vemana G; Bhayani SB
BJU Int; 2014 Feb; 113(2):343-7. PubMed ID: 23937601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Barriers to Effective Deliberation in Clinical Research Oversight.
Wenner DM
HEC Forum; 2016 Sep; 28(3):245-59. PubMed ID: 26613717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New rules for new drugs: the challenge of AIDS to the regulatory process.
Edgar H; Rothman DJ
Milbank Q; 1990; 68(Suppl. 1):111-42. PubMed ID: 11650413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
