These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Sex differences in the benefits of the guidelines applied in practice project: are they due to sex? Yan AT; Yan RT; Goodman SG Arch Intern Med; 2006 Nov; 166(21):2405-6; author reply 2406. PubMed ID: 17130398 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. NRMI (National Registry of Myocardial Infarction) data impacts care on many different levels. Healthc Benchmarks; 2002 Mar; 9(3):27, 29-31. PubMed ID: 11915161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Taking the national guideline for care of acute myocardial infarction to the bedside: developing the guideline applied in practice (GAP) initiative in Southeast Michigan. Eagle KA; Gallogly M; Mehta RH; Baker PL; Blount A; Freundl M; Orza MJ; Parrish R; Riba AL; Montoye CK Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 2002 Jan; 28(1):5-19. PubMed ID: 11787240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Taking the ACC/AHA guidelines for care of Acute Myocardial Infarction to the bedside: the GAP projects in southeastern Michigan. Eagle KA; Mehta RH; Riba AL; Defranco AC; Montoye CK; ; Am Heart J; 2004 Nov; 148(5 Suppl):S49-51. PubMed ID: 15514635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A quality guarantee in acute coronary syndromes: the American College of Cardiology's Guidelines Applied in Practice program taken real-time. Vasaiwala S; Nolan E; Ramanath VS; Fang J; Kearly G; Van Riper S; Kline-Rogers E; Otten R; Cody RA; Eagle KA Am Heart J; 2007 Jan; 153(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 17174631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enhancing quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: shifting the focus of improvement from key indicators to process of care and tool use: the American College of Cardiology Acute Myocardial Infarction Guidelines Applied in Practice Project in Michigan: Flint and Saginaw Expansion. Mehta RH; Montoye CK; Faul J; Nagle DJ; Kure J; Raj E; Fattal P; Sharrif S; Amlani M; Changezi HU; Skorcz S; Bailey N; Bourque T; LaTarte M; McLean D; Savoy S; Werner P; Baker PL; DeFranco A; Eagle KA; J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Jun; 43(12):2166-73. PubMed ID: 15193675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of acute coronary syndrome care at academic and nonacademic hospitals. Patel MR; Chen AY; Roe MT; Ohman EM; Newby LK; Harrington RA; Smith SC; Gibler WB; Calvin JE; Peterson ED Am J Med; 2007 Jan; 120(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 17208078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measuring performance for treating heart attacks and heart failure: the case for outcomes measurement. Krumholz HM; Normand SL; Spertus JA; Shahian DM; Bradley EH Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 17211016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Guideline-based care cuts mortality in elderly heart attack patients. Rollins G Rep Med Guidel Outcomes Res; 2004 Apr; 15(8):1-2, 5. PubMed ID: 15112658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Are the American College of Cardiology/Emergency Cardiac Care (ACC/ECC) guidelines useful in triaging patients to telemetry units? Tiongson J; Robin J; Chana A; Shin DD; Gheorghiade M Acute Card Care; 2006; 8(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 17012130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating and improving the delivery of heart care: the University of Michigan experience. Eagle KA; Moscucci M; Kline-Rogers E; Chaffee BW; Barry PA; Roberts S; Froehlich J; Cornish LA; Wurster H; Deeb GM Am J Manag Care; 1998 Sep; 4(9):1300-9. PubMed ID: 10185980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recent trends in the care of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: insights from the CRUSADE initiative. Mehta RH; Roe MT; Chen AY; Lytle BL; Pollack CV; Brindis RG; Smith SC; Harrington RA; Fintel D; Fraulo ES; Califf RM; Gibler WB; Ohman EM; Peterson ED Arch Intern Med; 2006 Oct; 166(18):2027-34. PubMed ID: 17030838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]