These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12822796)

  • 21. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The impact of reverberation on speech intelligibility in cochlear implant recipients.
    Kressner AA; Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Aug; 144(2):1113. PubMed ID: 30180700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
    D'Aquila LA; Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Relations Between the Intelligibility of Speech in Noise and Psychophysical Measures of Hearing Measured in Four Languages Using the Auditory Profile Test Battery.
    Van Esch TE; Dreschler WA
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26647417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The digits-in-noise test: assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise.
    Smits C; Theo Goverts S; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1693-706. PubMed ID: 23464039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sentence perception in listening conditions having similar speech intelligibility indices.
    Gustafson SJ; Pittman AL
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 21047291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Turn an Ear to Hear: How Hearing-Impaired Listeners Can Exploit Head Orientation to Enhance Their Speech Intelligibility in Noisy Social Settings.
    Grange JA; Culling JF; Bardsley B; Mackinney LI; Hughes SE; Backhouse SS
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518802701. PubMed ID: 30334495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.
    Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility.
    Qazi OU; van Dijk B; Moonen M; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2013 May; 299():79-87. PubMed ID: 23396271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Speech-in-noise measures: variable versus fixed speech and noise levels.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):708-12. PubMed ID: 22640687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Microscopic prediction of speech intelligibility in spatially distributed speech-shaped noise for normal-hearing listeners.
    Geravanchizadeh M; Fallah A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):4004-15. PubMed ID: 26723354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Modeling the effects of a single reflection on binaural speech intelligibility.
    Rennies J; Warzybok A; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1556-67. PubMed ID: 24606290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Payton KL; Uchanski RM; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1581-92. PubMed ID: 8176061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Coherence and the speech intelligibility index.
    Kates JM; Arehart KH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2224-37. PubMed ID: 15898663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test.
    Zokoll MA; Fidan D; Türkyılmaz D; Hochmuth S; Ergenç İ; Sennaroğlu G; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():51-61. PubMed ID: 26443486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    George EL; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2295-311. PubMed ID: 17069325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.