BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12822799)

  • 1. A nonlinear filter-bank model of the guinea-pig cochlear nerve: rate responses.
    Sumner CJ; O'Mard LP; Lopez-Poveda EA; Meddis R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jun; 113(6):3264-74. PubMed ID: 12822799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The temporal representation of speech in a nonlinear model of the guinea pig cochlea.
    Holmes SD; Sumner CJ; O'Mard LP; Meddis R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3534-45. PubMed ID: 15658705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A phenomenological model for the responses of auditory-nerve fibers. II. Nonlinear tuning with a frequency glide.
    Tan Q; Carney LH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2007-20. PubMed ID: 14587601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The importance of cochlear processing for the formation of auditory brainstem and frequency following responses.
    Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):936-50. PubMed ID: 12597187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency extent of two-tone facilitation in onset units in the ventral cochlear nucleus.
    Jiang D; Palmer AR; Winter IM
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Jan; 75(1):380-95. PubMed ID: 8822565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A dual filter model describing single-fiber responses to clicks in the normal and noise-damaged cochlea.
    Schoonhoven R; Keijzer J; Versnel H; Prijs VF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Apr; 95(4):2104-21. PubMed ID: 8201107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rate and timing cues associated with the cochlear amplifier: level discrimination based on monaural cross-frequency coincidence detection.
    Heinz MG; Colburn HS; Carney LH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2065-84. PubMed ID: 11681385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors that influence rate-versus-intensity relations in single cochlear nerve fibers of the gerbil.
    Ohlemiller KK; Echteler SM; Siegel JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):274-87. PubMed ID: 1652601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An approximate transfer function for the dual-resonance nonlinear filter model of auditory frequency selectivity.
    Lopez-Poveda EA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2112-7. PubMed ID: 14587609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A computational algorithm for computing nonlinear auditory frequency selectivity.
    Meddis R; O'Mard LP; Lopez-Poveda EA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jun; 109(6):2852-61. PubMed ID: 11425128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cochlear nerve fiber responses to amplitude-modulated stimuli: variations with spontaneous rate and other response characteristics.
    Cooper NP; Robertson D; Yates GK
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Jul; 70(1):370-86. PubMed ID: 8395584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A phenomenological model for the responses of auditory-nerve fibers: I. Nonlinear tuning with compression and suppression.
    Zhang X; Heinz MG; Bruce IC; Carney LH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Feb; 109(2):648-70. PubMed ID: 11248971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of a compressive nonlinearity in a cochlear model.
    Geisler CD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Jul; 78(1 Pt 1):257-60. PubMed ID: 2991354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency selectivity of single cochlear-nerve fibers based on the temporal response pattern to two-tone signals.
    Greenberg S; Geisler CD; Deng L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Apr; 79(4):1010-9. PubMed ID: 3700856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison between basilar membrane and inner hair cell receptor potential input-output functions in the guinea pig cochlea.
    Patuzzi R; Sellick PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Dec; 74(6):1734-41. PubMed ID: 6655131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Further studies on the dual-resonance nonlinear filter model of cochlear frequency selectivity: responses to tones.
    Lopez-Najera A; Lopez-Poveda EA; Meddis R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2124-34. PubMed ID: 17902850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochlear nonlinearity between 500 and 8000 Hz in listeners with normal hearing.
    Lopez-Poveda EA; Plack CJ; Meddis R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):951-60. PubMed ID: 12597188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intensity coding in low-frequency auditory-nerve fibers of the guinea pig.
    Winter IM; Palmer AR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1958-67. PubMed ID: 1960289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Threshold tuning curves of chinchilla auditory nerve fibers. II. Dependence on spontaneous activity and relation to cochlear nonlinearity.
    Temchin AN; Rich NC; Ruggero MA
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Nov; 100(5):2899-906. PubMed ID: 18753325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cochlear potentials in the Bronx waltzer mutant mouse.
    Bock GR; Yates GK; Deol MS
    Neurosci Lett; 1982 Dec; 34(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 6298667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.