These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
513 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12823232)
1. A comparative evaluation of digital imaging, retinal photography and optometrist examination in screening for diabetic retinopathy. Olson JA; Strachan FM; Hipwell JH; Goatman KA; McHardy KC; Forrester JV; Sharp PF Diabet Med; 2003 Jul; 20(7):528-34. PubMed ID: 12823232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: a comparative trial of photography and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Wilson PJ; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Ellingford A; Talbot J; Leese GP Ophthalmologica; 2010; 224(4):251-7. PubMed ID: 20145421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The value of digital imaging in diabetic retinopathy. Sharp PF; Olson J; Strachan F; Hipwell J; Ludbrook A; O'Donnell M; Wallace S; Goatman K; Grant A; Waugh N; McHardy K; Forrester JV Health Technol Assess; 2003; 7(30):1-119. PubMed ID: 14604499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A telemedical approach to the screening of diabetic retinopathy: digital fundus photography. Liesenfeld B; Kohner E; Piehlmeier W; Kluthe S; Aldington S; Porta M; Bek T; Obermaier M; Mayer H; Mann G; Holle R; Hepp KD Diabetes Care; 2000 Mar; 23(3):345-8. PubMed ID: 10868863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by one-field, non-mydriatic, 45 degrees digital photography is inadequate. Kuo HK; Hsieh HH; Liu RT Ophthalmologica; 2005; 219(5):292-6. PubMed ID: 16123556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is screening with digital imaging using one retinal view adequate? Herbert HM; Jordan K; Flanagan DW Eye (Lond); 2003 May; 17(4):497-500. PubMed ID: 12802350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease. Murgatroyd H; Ellingford A; Cox A; Binnie M; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Leese GP Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):920-4. PubMed ID: 15205238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effectiveness of screening for diabetic retinopathy by digital imaging photography and technician ophthalmoscopy. Scanlon PH; Malhotra R; Thomas G; Foy C; Kirkpatrick JN; Lewis-Barned N; Harney B; Aldington SJ Diabet Med; 2003 Jun; 20(6):467-74. PubMed ID: 12786681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using digital colour photography and oral fluorescein angiography. Newsom R; Moate B; Casswell T Eye (Lond); 2000 Aug; 14 ( Pt 4)():579-82. PubMed ID: 11040903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retinal video recording a new way to image and diagnose diabetic retinopathy. Ting DS; Tay-Kearney ML; Constable I; Lim L; Preen DB; Kanagasingam Y Ophthalmology; 2011 Aug; 118(8):1588-93. PubMed ID: 21684608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy of non-mydriatic fundus camera for screening of diabetic retinopathy: A hospital based observational study in Pakistan. Fahadullah M; Memon NA; Salim S; Ahsan S; Fahim MF; Mumtaz SN; Shaikh SA; Memon MS J Pak Med Assoc; 2019 Mar; 69(3):378-382. PubMed ID: 30890831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An observational study to assess if automated diabetic retinopathy image assessment software can replace one or more steps of manual imaging grading and to determine their cost-effectiveness. Tufail A; Kapetanakis VV; Salas-Vega S; Egan C; Rudisill C; Owen CG; Lee A; Louw V; Anderson J; Liew G; Bolter L; Bailey C; Sadda S; Taylor P; Rudnicka AR Health Technol Assess; 2016 Dec; 20(92):1-72. PubMed ID: 27981917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing diabetic retinopathy using two-field digital photography and the influence of JPEG-compression. Stellingwerf C; Hardus PL; Hooymans JM Doc Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 108(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 15573944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal imaging for screening diabetic retinopathy. Lopez-Bastida J; Cabrera-Lopez F; Serrano-Aguilar P Diabet Med; 2007 Apr; 24(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 17298591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness and safety of screening for diabetic retinopathy with two nonmydriatic digital images compared with the seven standard stereoscopic photographic fields. Boucher MC; Gresset JA; Angioi K; Olivier S Can J Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 38(7):557-68. PubMed ID: 14740797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography. Lin DY; Blumenkranz MS; Brothers RJ; Grosvenor DM Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 12140027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated detection of diabetic retinopathy in a fundus photographic screening population. Larsen N; Godt J; Grunkin M; Lund-Andersen H; Larsen M Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Feb; 44(2):767-71. PubMed ID: 12556412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of retinal lesions in diabetic retinopathy: comparative evaluation of 7-field digital color photography versus red-free photography. Venkatesh P; Sharma R; Vashist N; Vohra R; Garg S Int Ophthalmol; 2015 Oct; 35(5):635-40. PubMed ID: 22961609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity of Hand Held Fundus Camera by Optometrist using Slit lamp 90D bio microscopy as a reference standard for screening of Diabetes Retinopathy. Ahsan S; Haseeb U; Memon MS; Bukhari S; Mahmood T; Fahim MF J Pak Med Assoc; 2022 Nov; 72(11):2189-2192. PubMed ID: 37013284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]