These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12827843)

  • 1. HMOS--independent medical review--preemption. Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran.
    Benefits Q; 2003; 19(2):96-8. PubMed ID: 12827843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Should your ERISA remedy depend upon your geography?: an analysis of Rush Prudential HMO, INC. v. Moran.
    Schulz AM
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2003; 19(2):553-71. PubMed ID: 14748257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ERISA: no preemption of state's HMO law requiring independent physician review.
    Sapeika T
    J Law Med Ethics; 2000; 28(4):407-9. PubMed ID: 11317432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preemption--HMOs--independent physician review of medical necessity. Moran v. Rush Prudential HMO, Inc., 230 F.3d 959 (7th Cir. 2000), cert. granted,--U.S.--150 L.Ed.2d 749 (2001).
    Benefits Q; 2002; 18(4):70-2. PubMed ID: 12407899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Supreme Court rejects preemption in ERISA benefits dispute. Rush Prudential, Inc. v. Moran.
    Morreim EH
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2002 Nov; 20(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 12412312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ERISA takes a drubbing: Rush Prudential and its implications for health care.
    Morreim EH
    Tort Trial Insur Pract Law J; 2003; 38(3):933-61. PubMed ID: 12866544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of the recent Supreme Court rulings in Pegram and Rush Prudential on state regulation of managed care organizations.
    Trueman DL
    J Health Law; 2003; 36(1):107-32. PubMed ID: 12784923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Supreme court upholds state independent review laws: does this help or hinder health plans?
    Bloom A
    Manag Care Interface; 2002 Sep; 15(9):56-7, 61. PubMed ID: 12244651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The final chapter (maybe) of preemption of HMO accountability under state law.
    Jordan K
    Health Care Law Mon; 2004 Feb; ():15-27. PubMed ID: 14989070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Independent review of HMO decisions: The Supreme Court hears oral argument in Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran.
    Drenning MG
    Health Care Law Mon; 2002 Feb; ():3-5. PubMed ID: 12436733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. HMOs, accountability, and the death of ERISA preemption.
    Zaremski MJ
    J Leg Med; 2002 Dec; 23(4):547-62. PubMed ID: 12495544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. HMOs-health plans--failure to cover certain treatment-preemption. Aetna Health, Inc. v. Davila.
    Benefits Q; 2005; 21(4):69, 71-5. PubMed ID: 16524037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ERISA preemption: will the elimination of the ERISA preemption clause help or harm America's ability to deal with its pending health care crisis?
    Taylor DH
    J Law Health; 1999-2000; 14(1):133-78. PubMed ID: 11187365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Federal jurisdiction--preemption--state antisubrogation law--state law regulating insurance saved from preemption. Singh v. Prudential Health Care Plan.
    Benefits Q; 2005; 21(3):60-1. PubMed ID: 16248231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Any Willing Provider" laws not preempted by Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Kentucky Association of Health Plans, Inc. et. al. v. Miller, Commissioner, Kentucky Department of Insurance.
    Benefits Q; 2004; 20(3):69-70. PubMed ID: 15453199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High court upholds independent physician reviews under state law.
    Drenning MG
    Health Care Law Mon; 2002 Jul; ():3-9. PubMed ID: 12420399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ERISA preemption and the legal liability of HMOs: possibilities for change.
    Lynk MV
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1998 Nov; 90(11):645-7. PubMed ID: 9828578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ERISA preemption defenses rejected. Nealy v. US Healthcare HMO.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2000 Jan; 17(3):4-6. PubMed ID: 10724626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Which rules-state law or ERISA? Patients' rights case before high court could have big impact on HMO enrollees.
    Benko LB
    Mod Healthc; 2002 Jan; 32(3):16. PubMed ID: 11840846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Circuits split on ERISA preemption of state hospital rate systems.
    Margolis RE
    Healthspan; 1993 Dec; 10(11):19-20. PubMed ID: 10167063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.