These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12828427)
1. On reference points--Cartesian vs Lagrangian. Pae EK Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):iv. PubMed ID: 12828427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cephalometric appraisal for craniofacial imbalances in orthodontic & surgical anomalies. Bowden BD Aust Orthod J; 1980 Oct; 6(4):154-77. PubMed ID: 6940560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A review of vertical facial types and craniomandibular disorders. Pertes RA N Y State Dent J; 1985 Nov; 51(9):570, 572, 575-8. PubMed ID: 3865118 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of the cephalometric analyses of Bjørk, Ricketts and Sassouni with the measurements of MacNamara and Wits]. Bolender Y; Deblock L; Theuveny T; Bolender CJ; Turlot JC Rev Orthop Dento Faciale; 1986; 20(2):251-71. PubMed ID: 3466314 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Video cephalometric diagnosis (VCD): a new concept in treatment planning? Sarver DM Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Aug; 110(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 8760838 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comments on diagnosis of skeletal form. Germane N Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Sep; 102(3):23A. PubMed ID: 1510048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Ideal cephalometric standards for the Italian population]. Colangelo GG; Malagola C; Festa F; Buffone P Mondo Ortod; 1986; 11(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 3461271 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Cephalometric analysis according to Delaire]. Chimenti C; Cascone P; Silvestri A; Iannetti G Riv Ital Stomatol; 1981; 50(7-8):571-85. PubMed ID: 6960425 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes. Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of the skeletal structures of individuals with malocclusion (1)]. Arat M; Ozdiler E; Işeri H Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1985; 12(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 3870108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evolution of the convexity of tegumental profile during mixed dentition]. Duduca I; Ionescu E; Milicescu V Bacteriol Virusol Parazitol Epidemiol; 2004; 49(3-4):187-93. PubMed ID: 16938941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Floating norms as a means to describe individual skeletal patterns. Segner D Eur J Orthod; 1989 Aug; 11(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 2676569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of soft and hard tissue profiles of orthognathic surgery patients treated recently and 20 years earlier. Papadopoulos MA; Lazaridou-Terzoudi T; Øland J; Athanasiou AE; Melsen B Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jul; 108(1):e8-13. PubMed ID: 19540447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Orthodontics. Part 2: Patient assessment and examination I. Roberts-Harry D; Sandy J Br Dent J; 2003 Nov; 195(9):489-93. PubMed ID: 14610554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]