251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12830397)
1. [Functional and cosmetic relevance of primary orbital implants].
Kohlhaas M; Schulz D
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2003 Jun; 220(6):418-22. PubMed ID: 12830397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative motility of hydroxyapatite and alloplastic enucleation implants.
Custer PL; Trinkaus KM; Fornoff J
Ophthalmology; 1999 Mar; 106(3):513-6. PubMed ID: 10080207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [How can artificial eye motility be improved? The influence of fornix configuration and tissue thickness in front of hydroxyapatite-silicon implants in 66 patients].
Klett A; Guthoff R
Ophthalmologe; 2003 Jun; 100(6):445-8. PubMed ID: 12820010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Muscle pedunculated scleral flaps. A microsurgical modification to improve prosthesis motility].
Klett A; Guthoff R
Ophthalmologe; 2003 Jun; 100(6):449-52. PubMed ID: 12820011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Complications of primary placement of motility post in porous polyethylene implants during enucleation.
Yazici B; Akova B; Sanli O
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 May; 143(5):828-834. PubMed ID: 17362860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of orbital prosthesis motility following enucleation or evisceration with sclerotomy with or without a motility coupling post in dogs.
Yi NY; Park SA; Jeong MB; Kim WT; Kim SE; Kim JY; Chae JM; Jang KJ; Seong JK; Seo KM
Vet Ophthalmol; 2009; 12(3):139-51. PubMed ID: 19392873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The 'baseball' orbital implant: a prospective study.
Leatherbarrow B; Kwartz J; Sunderland S; Brammar R; Nichol E
Eye (Lond); 1994; 8 ( Pt 5)():569-76. PubMed ID: 7835455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perspective on orbital enucleation implants.
Sami D; Young S; Petersen R
Surv Ophthalmol; 2007; 52(3):244-65. PubMed ID: 17472801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Orbital implants of coralline hydroxyapatite as eye replacement after enucleation].
Busin M; Mönks T; Menzel C
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1994 Jun; 204(6):518-22. PubMed ID: 7933898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Postnucleation orbital implants.
Henc-Petrinović L; Ritz-Mutevelić L; Dosen-Maricić V; Petelin M; Gabrić N
Acta Med Croatica; 1991; 45(4-5):369-75. PubMed ID: 1726522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Orbital implants in enucleation surgery: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Custer PL; Kennedy RH; Woog JJ; Kaltreider SA; Meyer DR
Ophthalmology; 2003 Oct; 110(10):2054-61. PubMed ID: 14522788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The glass spherical hollow orbital implant: a prospective study.
Stephen BE
Ceylon Med J; 1999 Jun; 44(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 10565073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Epithelial giant inclusion cyst 50 years after enucleation without orbital implant].
Jünemann A; Holbach LM
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1998 Feb; 212(2):127-8. PubMed ID: 9577816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between motility of biointegratable and silicone orbital implants.
González-Candial M; Umaña MA; Galvez C; Medel R; Ayala E
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):711-2. PubMed ID: 17386291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Orbito-palpebral prosthesis and intraosseous implants].
Labbe D; Sabin P; Madjidi A; Foussadier F; Langeard F; Pillet M; Compère JF
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1992; 93(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 1542774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dermis fat grafts as primary and secondary orbital implants.
Nentwich MM; Schebitz-Walter K; Hirneiss C; Hintschich C
Orbit; 2014 Feb; 33(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 24195744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implant and prosthesis movement after enucleation: a randomized controlled trial.
Shome D; Honavar SG; Raizada K; Raizada D
Ophthalmology; 2010 Aug; 117(8):1638-44. PubMed ID: 20417565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Late exposure of the bioceramic orbital implant.
Wang JK; Lai PC; Liao SL
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 147(1):162-170.e1. PubMed ID: 18571617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Tolerance of orbital implants. Retrospective study on 14 years].
Ducasse A; Segal A; Gotzamanis A; Brugniart C; Rossi P
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2001 Mar; 24(3):277-81. PubMed ID: 11285443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of motility: autogenous dermis-fat vs synthetic spherical implants.
Bosniak SL; Nesi F; Smith BC; Schechter B; Cote R
Ophthalmic Surg; 1989 Dec; 20(12):889-91. PubMed ID: 2630970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
