BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12830603)

  • 1. Labour induction at term--a randomised trial comparing Foley catheter plus titrated oral misoprostol solution, titrated oral misoprostol solution alone, and dinoprostone.
    Matonhodze BB; Hofmeyr GJ; Levin J
    S Afr Med J; 2003 May; 93(5):375-9. PubMed ID: 12830603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Induction of labour at term with oral misoprostol versus a Foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.
    Ten Eikelder ML; Oude Rengerink K; Jozwiak M; de Leeuw JW; de Graaf IM; van Pampus MG; Holswilder M; Oudijk MA; van Baaren GJ; Pernet PJ; Bax C; van Unnik GA; Martens G; Porath M; van Vliet H; Rijnders RJ; Feitsma AH; Roumen FJ; van Loon AJ; Versendaal H; Weinans MJ; Woiski M; van Beek E; Hermsen B; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW
    Lancet; 2016 Apr; 387(10028):1619-28. PubMed ID: 26850983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated oral misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor.
    Rouzi AA; Alsibiani S; Mansouri N; Alsinani N; Darhouse K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 210(1):56.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23999422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction.
    Prager M; Eneroth-Grimfors E; Edlund M; Marions L
    BJOG; 2008 Oct; 115(11):1443-50. PubMed ID: 18715244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labour.
    Kerr RS; Kumar N; Williams MJ; Cuthbert A; Aflaifel N; Haas DM; Weeks AD
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Jun; 6(6):CD014484. PubMed ID: 34155622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Titrated low-dose vaginal and/or oral misoprostol to induce labour for prelabour membrane rupture: a randomised trial.
    Bricker L; Peden H; Tomlinson AJ; Al-Hussaini TK; Idama T; Candelier C; Luckas M; Furniss H; Davies A; Kumar B; Roberts J; Alfirevic Z
    BJOG; 2008 Nov; 115(12):1503-11. PubMed ID: 18752586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel.
    Danielian P; Porter B; Ferri N; Summers J; Templeton A
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol for labour induction].
    Panelius E; Heikinheimo O; Rahkonen L
    Duodecim; 2012; 128(20):2093-102. PubMed ID: 23167168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Titrated oral misoprostol solution for induction of labour: a multi-centre, randomised trial.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Alfirevic Z; Matonhodze B; Brocklehurst P; Campbell E; Nikodem VC
    BJOG; 2001 Sep; 108(9):952-9. PubMed ID: 11563466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a more effective agent than prostaglandin F2 alpha gel and prostaglandin E2 pessary.
    Majoko F; Zwizwai M; Nyström L; Lindmark G
    Cent Afr J Med; 2002; 48(11-12):123-8. PubMed ID: 14562597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF 2-HOURLY 20 MCG ORAL MISOPROSTOL SOLUTION COMPARED TO STANDARD INTRAVENOUS OXYTOCIN IN LABOUR INDUCTION DUE TO PRE-LABOUR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM: A RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL AT KENYATTA NATIONAL HOSPITAL.
    Mbaluka CM; Kamau K; Karanja JG; Mugo N
    East Afr Med J; 2014 Sep; 91(9):303-10. PubMed ID: 26866082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.
    Jozwiak M; Oude Rengerink K; Benthem M; van Beek E; Dijksterhuis MG; de Graaf IM; van Huizen ME; Oudijk MA; Papatsonis DN; Perquin DA; Porath M; van der Post JA; Rijnders RJ; Scheepers HC; Spaanderman ME; van Pampus MG; de Leeuw JW; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW;
    Lancet; 2011 Dec; 378(9809):2095-103. PubMed ID: 22030144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term (CRBplus trial): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial.
    Kehl S; Ziegler J; Schleussner E; Tuschy B; Berlit S; Kirscht J; Hägele F; Weiss C; Siemer J; Sütterlin M
    BJOG; 2015 Jan; 122(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 25327872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomised comparison of oral misoprostol and vaginal prostaglandin E2 tablets in labour induction at term.
    Shetty A; Livingstone I; Acharya S; Rice P; Danielian P; Templeton A
    BJOG; 2004 May; 111(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 15104606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
    Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW
    BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Oral misoprostol against vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a randomized comparison].
    Henrich W; Dudenhausen JW; Hanel C; Chen FC
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2008 Oct; 212(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 18956276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Hill JB; Thigpen BD; Bofill JA; Magann E; Moore LE; Martin JN
    Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of oral misoprostol tablets and vaginal prostaglandin E2 pessary in induction of labour at term.
    Hassan AA
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 May; 15(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 15907239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.